Yuku free message boards

TobaccoRhoda wrote:

---

Here's my question. Why is the person who is an uninsured motorist arguing for mandatory health insurance?

TequilaVaquero wrote:

---

Aunor wrote:

---

I think we can agree there are people, through no fault of their own that are uninsured, under insured or uninsurable.

You also have those the choose to go without coverage.

The question is what to do?

You may think that going uninsured is just a risk you assume, however its not, when you end up in Hospital (for what ever reason.... say a car wreck) those paying into the system pick up the tab.

The "youthful male[s]" all need to pay in.

But that is just one veiw of people like Trixie Delight.

Then is moral part to this issue... which goes back to the people, through no fault of their own that are uninsured, under insured or uninsurable.

(and Lila Fowler I like this poem http://quotations.about.com/od/poemlyrics/a/wordsworth24.htm )

I'm saying that as my classification for auto insurance, it is a higher risk class. It doesn't have anything to do with health insurance (although youthful males are probably some of the least likely to need medical care as a whole, we don't have vaginas to take care of).

Sloansalad wrote:

---

1. You have to pay for the part where you might cause yourself problems.

(I am sorry that is false.)

Here at OT, you can't just say no without doing one of two things:
1. Explaining why they are wrong
2. Cussing and flaming them hoping they start flaming back instead of point out the lack of logic in your argument.

Trixie Delight already did that.
I have to repeat it over and over?

I am sorry you feel that way.

I for one think people like you should be paying in.