I only yesterday realized why I dislike DAnny so much: He reminds me way too much of the worst winner ever. And I am sure DAnny DID get screwed in the ass. Repeatedly. It would explain a lot, especially from Kara.
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
cginspace |
|||
|
I only yesterday realized why I dislike DAnny so much: He reminds me way too much of the worst winner ever. And I am sure DAnny DID get screwed in the ass. Repeatedly. It would explain a lot, especially from Kara. |
|||
Drew B |
|||
abrahammy wrote: Not particularly. I don't take much about this show that seriously. However, performance order/pimp spot is an objective measure. As for getting "slammed", it is subjective as to whether it is warranted and deserved or a case of getting screwed. |
|||
taks |
|||
|
If we're looking at going a long time without the pimp spot as a measure for screwage- you know who got really screwed?
Jasmine Trias- all the way to the top 3 without a single pimp spot! What's up with that? (This is all in jest, she performed at the end almost consistently. Using my not-so-informative measure, she'd average a 62.2% in performance order and if you take out her F4 and F3 performances, where the producers were clearly telling her to hit the road, that average jumps to 70.4%) Jasmine was ROBBED! |
|||
Drew B |
|||
|
You're right. I didn't remember Jasmine hadn't ever been given the pimp spot. She's more robbed than Danny (unless he lasts this week and next
and still never gets it).
Your percentage system is interesting, but I think the actual pimp spot is a separate measure entirely. There's not much difference between 2nd and 3rd position on, say, Top 9 week. Moreover, singing 1st is probably PREFERABLE to 2nd or 3rd. On the other hand, there's a HUGE difference between going last and second to last... Your system treats every interval in position equally, but I don't think they are equivalent... |
|||
Ahora |
|||
taks wrote:X Jasmine was the most robbed contestant ever |
|||