| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
MMead7 |
Knowing. |
Lead | |
|
I was so excited about seeing this movie because I love disaster themed movies. The special effects is this were awesome; Nick Cage's hair piece, not so
much...
|
|||
squashthebeef |
|||
|
Oh goody! Another MOVIE thread! ::tingle::
|
|||
leeter |
|||
|
Are you saying Booo or Buuuu-urns?
|
|||
NlGHTCRAWLER |
|||
|
Didnt Nicholas Cage JUST have another movie out like a year ago where he knew bad things were going to happen?
|
|||
pussycow |
|||
|
Don't we all know bad things are going to happen when a Nicholas Cage movie comes out?
|
|||
Penelope McBagpipe |
|||
|
Good point, but the comedic value of the Wicker Man is the one reason I can't fully hate him.
|
|||
UrbanSprawl |
|||
|
Even for a critic against spoiling films, public service trumps professional courtesy. Read the plot of Just Kissing and realize that Knowing is a similarly anticlimactic, idiotic leap into low-end Shyamalan-ian insanity, with a dash of moderate fundamentalism. One can hope Earth's final hours aren't as interminable as this cartoonish rapture wish-fulfillment yarn, in which only sequences of destruction distract from its dunderheadedness. Maintaining his always-compelling visual style, only director Alex Proyas (I, Robot, The Crow) and the senior pyro foreperson earn their keep. Blending doomsday mysticism, otherworldly phenomena, rough gay sex and quasi-spiritualism, Knowing blatantly references Close Encounters of the Third Kind. But there are no lumpy mashed potatoes, just another lumpy performance from Nicolas Cage bound to warrant yet another curb job. Granted, it's nothing like karate-kicking Leelee Sobieski in the face or scampering around in a bear costume. But when Cage whaps a tree with a baseball bat, yelling "You want some of this?!," the nosedive begins. Alex Proyas Opens Knowing With Paranormal Promise, But It's Short-Lived An opening prologue in 1959 sets a tone of paranormal pathos and paranoia shared by Mark Pellington's underrated The Mothman Prophecies, but it doesn't last long. While most kids draw pictures of rockets and robots to place inside a new elementary school's time capsule, young Lucinda (Lara Robinson) furiously scribbles a sheet of numbers and listens to voices swirling in her head. When the capsule is opened 50 years later, young Caleb Koestler (Chandler Canterbury) brings home Lucinda's message. Soon, he's hearing a whirl of whispers, and is stalked by mystery men who resemble Paul Mitchell hair models of the 1990s. Caleb lives with his father, John (Cage), a widowed MIT professor so ashen and hopeless over his wife's accidental death that he looks ready to crack a fifth of rye in his classroom. During yet another late-night bender, John hones in on one particular number sequence - 9/11/01 - and he eventually decodes Lucinda's scrawl. Like a Little Suzie Nostradamus, Lucinda has predicted the dates, coordinates and casualties of every major global disaster and casual gay hook-up since 1959. The catch: There are future dates on the calendar, and they're rapidly approaching. John races against time - and a lifetime of scientist logic - to ward off a potentially global disaster and save his son from "the whisper people" (who do what can only be described as belching rays of light). Nicolas Cage, Screenplay, Score Trample Natural Opportunities for Emotion It's here that Knowing could achieve the pop-culture poetry of unexpected heroism in Unbreakable, and Cage could channel the paternal persistence of Jeff Bridges in Arlington Road (another great from Pellington). But a dopey script and infuriatingly lazy leading man constantly choose bad Shyamalan over slightly less bad Shyamalan. Knowing's ballyhooed plane- and subway-crash sequences are bravura - dazzling, alarming, haunting and immediate in a way the rest of the film is not. Only Cage, in full paycheck-collecting mega-thriller mode, could trample their intense-stress payoffs. It's not long before he confuses human turmoil with jutted hands and a raised voice in the most painfully empty performance yet for a once-reliable risk-taker. He's got strong competition for being the worst element of the film. First is a leaden screenplay with non-existent pacing and plot-twist predications - like an a-ha! moment with an electric pleasuring tool - as dumb as the cereal-box moment of Lady in the Water. Equally awful is Marco Beltrami's intrusive score - like Bernard Herrmann on crack cocaine, all bleating brass, thick pizzicato strings and thunderous percussion. For all its thunderous effects, Knowing never unnerves or unsettles, settling instead for faux-desolation before its emotionally bogus resolution. Knowing debates randomness versus determinism, and its stupidity proves it's definitely determined to waste your time. |
|||
snowboarders only |
|||
|
Stupidest.Movie.Title.Ever
|
|||
PoChop |
|||
|
What's his name in the movie? Nick Valenzetti?
|
|||
pussycow |
|||
Penelope McBagpipe wrote: Raising Arizona is the reason I can't fully hate him |
|||
MidwayHaven |
|||
Penelope McBagpipe wrote: Any movie with Cage dying a pointless death is good enough for me. |
|||
sadllama |
|||
|
the title is pretty accurate, since everybody knew this would be a shitty movie once they saw nicholas cage was in it.
|
|||
Stud Muffin |
|||
|
Posts: 20 (03/22/09 10:06 PM) |
Movie with Cage in it = I'll watch when it's free online...maybe.
|
||
Fucking Sucks |
|||
|
"8mm" is a great Nicolas Cage movie.
"Face/Off"...not so much. |
|||
Antithesys |
|||
|
Knowing is almost terrific. What it does is take an extraordinarily good, classical science-fiction premise about determinism, and a bewildering third
act seemingly taken from a completely different good, classical science-fiction premise, and tries valiantly to graft the one on top of the other. It
doesn't quite work, but the two parts in themselves are each good enough to save the movie and make it worthwhile for open-minded sci-fi audiences. Some
kids in the theater were laughing at the last few scenes, and I guess I don't really blame them, but there are far worse, far cheesier ways to end a movie.
I definitely would have preferred a different third act, though it did have some really, really neat special effects.
Problems: |
|||
sadllama |
|||
Antithesys wrote: oh dear lord. |
|||
Pseudo Propaganda |
|||
pussycow wrote: |
|||
cindidindi76 |
|||
pussycow wrote: Same here. Doesn't he have an Oscar? |
|||
UrbanSprawl |
|||
|
Oh my god, Antithesys, NO. Just NO.
You need to get laid. |
|||
CBRetriever |
|||
The coordinates in the movie are expressed only as decimals of degrees. This is not nearly enough information to be useful on a GPS, nor is it enough to pinpoint a specific intersection. All you could tell with those numbers are that it would be Manhattan-ishdecimal degrees carried out to 6 places can get you almost precisely on top of a spot - it's what the MMS and most states require for registering well locations. A typical sample to illustrate precision in decimal degree notation would be as follows:I prefer it to x,y locations since projections can make a real difference. |
|||
Penelope McBagpipe |
|||
pussycow wrote: Well the comedy in the Wickerman was unintentional but actually you're right. and The Weatherman had it's moments too. |
|||