| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
factoryhurl |
|||
|
amt <3
|
|||
cg41386 |
|||
Oowatanite wrote: It's not misleading at all. It perfectly describes the way many feel about the issue- pro-choice. Pro-abortion, OTOH, is very misleading. |
|||
Vicconius |
|||
|
A "non-news site" poll on the debate from AOHELL.
Poll Results Who won the debate? Sarah Palin 47% 210,186 Joe Biden 45% 202,361 It was a draw 8% 37,691 Note on Poll Results Total Votes: 450,238 |
|||
B DeBrun |
|||
|
I guess Vicc was trying to suggest that Palin did a nice job copying Obama's debate strategy of maintaining composure and giving non direct non answers.
|
|||
StatelyWayneManor |
|||
|
Waiting for her Chris Matthews interview to discuss her debate victory. I'm also waiting for Giselle to dump Tom Brady & boink me.
|
|||
Ann Margret Thatcher |
|||
|
I suppose then all Obama needs to do is to perfect his wink.
|
|||
PassionatePiscesMan |
|||
|
Obama should call Palin sweetie
|
|||
Vicconius |
|||
|
Frank Luntz did a polling session with undecideds mixed evenly with Kerry voters and Bush voters from 2004. Yes, it's on FNC, but it's very interesting
and gives a glimpse into what "main street" thinks about the debate.
� |
|||
MunchkinsByProxy |
|||
Vicconius wrote:I guess AOHELL has a high percentage of rednecks....... Hmmm, is that how they decided to call Republican states red states? |
|||
StatelyWayneManor |
|||
|
Y'know...I don't think I want Obama winking at me. I heard he is busy waving the white flag of surrender.
|
|||
Vicconius |
|||
|
It's an online poll, like the CNN/MSNBC/FNC polls.
|
|||
buckitex |
|||
|
I can't believe the issue of McCain planning to tax the employer contribution of your Health Care is not getting more attention. Does no one realize how
much extra income you will be claiming? Just an example: My husband and I pay a monthly pre-tax contribution of about $300 for Family coverage. The employer
portion of this coverage is around $1200 per month. Under this "tax plan" we would have to claim over $14,000 in income above our wages.
Scary stuff. |
|||
AllMenAreIslands |
|||
meatball77 wrote: Excellent post, meatball. It was subtle, maybe, but it's definitely an example of "showing" not just "telling." |
|||
StatelyWayneManor |
|||
|
He did say the economy wasn't his strong suit. In his defense...
|
|||
AllMenAreIslands |
|||
rugslug wrote:Hardly a fair example. The Lebanese don't know what's going on in Lebanon either. |
|||
StatelyWayneManor |
|||
|
Mmm, lesbanese. I like it when they wear cheerleader uniforms.
|
|||
meatball77 |
|||
AllMenAreIslands wrote: I didn't write that. It's an article from the huff. Good one though |
|||
PassionatePiscesMan |
|||
|
Oh I got so choked up too. Boo hoo.
|
|||
rugslug |
|||
|
How about some more Biden gaffes?
"Pakistan already has nuclear weapons. Pakistan already has deployed nuclear weapons. Pakistan's weapons can already hit Israel and the Mediterranean." This site indicates that the top range of Pakistani missile that can carry a nuclear warhead is 1000 miles. The distance between Israel and Pakistan is 2,085 miles, or 3355 kilometers. |
|||
AllMenAreIslands |
|||
cg41386 wrote: Oo, why are you still arguing this point and why won't you accept the "choice" is the ideal name for the position of those who value freedom and separation of church & state? It is not a decree - you MUST get an abortion unless you can satisfy such & such criteria. That's how they do things in China. It is also not a push towards outlawing abortion, or declaring that only such & such criteria will be acceptable reasons for having an abortion, which is what the anti-abortionists want to see happen. It is saying - CHOICE. The options are all there, it's up to the individual to decide what's best for herself taking into account all the circumstances of her life. |
|||