Yuku free message boards

Relynn wrote:

---

Katy Carney wrote:

---

Except that those people who got to the end "without backstabbing", specifically Amanda, only got there because of Parvati's scheming. That's why it's a stupid argument to begin with. The success of Amanda's game was completely dependent on the moves that Parvati has made, aligning with the fans, backstabbing Ozzy, all of it worked to benefit Amanda. It's why Parvati should win over Amanda. She's the one who worked for it.

How did Parv's moves benefit Amanda. Parv's "new alliances" almost got Amanda voted out. It in no ways benefited Amanda, and made it harder for Amanda to get to the end of the game. Now, sure Amanda might have wanted to make a move against Ozzy but perhaps Amanda would have preferred to do it in a way that ensured that she was still in control and in the majority.. Parv's moves "didn't benefit Amanda, they positioned Parvati.. Which is fine, but the point is that inspite of Parv's moves, Amanda still managed to get to the end, and with a lot less people angry with her.

It may have helped Amanda get to the end with people she may be able to beat. Do you think she would beat James and Ozzy? Parvati did what Amanda did in China, she took out a threat at the right time. Ozzy probably would have won all the ICs since his boot. If Parvati had not made an alliance (that included Amanda) then the fans could have taken control at the merge with Eliza's help if they got Eric back. Cirie would not risk a tie and would have jumped.

If Ozzy were still in the game, do you think Cirie and even Parvati would not have turned and started taking out Ozzy's alliance if they couldn't get him. They had the numbers and they all knew Ozzy had to go obviously or they would not have booted him when they did. Amanda almost got herself voted out because she made herself a target. Parvati didn't do that. When they said she was a jury threat, she said nothing to contradict their fears. When Alexis said she has done no harm to the present jury, she should have said she booted Eliza and Jason just like the others. Without her vote they don't go. Say she was the swing vote, give them anything. She could have turned on the girls with James, Eric and Jason. She's knows she couldn't beat them in challenges and that is why she didn't. Give them another target like maybe Alexis. She has harmed less people on the jury than Amanda if you think about it. She only had to convince Nat about Alexis or Eric about Nat and Alexis. Lie and promise Eric F4. Point out how Nat manipulated Jason twice and he can't trust her. She has to be able to give them a reason to believe they could beat her. She did nothing but count on the HII. Parvati moves have given Amanda a chance to win.

Relynn wrote:

---

urrout wrote:

---

It may have helped Amanda get to the end with people she may be able to beat. Do you think she would beat James and Ozzy? Parvati did what Amanda did in China, she took out a threat at the right time. Ozzy probably would have won all the ICs since his boot. If Parvati had not made an alliance (that included Amanda) then the fans could have taken control at the merge with Eliza's help if they got Eric back. Cirie would not risk a tie and would have jumped.

If Ozzy were still in the game, do you think Cirie and even Parvati would not have turned and started taking out Ozzy's alliance if they couldn't get him. They had the numbers and they all knew Ozzy had to go obviously or they would not have booted him when they did. Amanda almost got herself voted out because she made herself a target. Parvati didn't do that. When they said she was a jury threat, she said nothing to contradict their fears. When Alexis said she has done no harm to the present jury, she should have said she booted Eliza and Jason just like the others. Without her vote they don't go. Say she was the swing vote, give them anything. She could have turned on the girls with James, Eric and Jason. She's knows she couldn't beat them in challenges and that is why she didn't. Give them another target like maybe Alexis. She has harmed less people on the jury than Amanda if you think about it. She only had to convince Nat about Alexis or Eric about Nat and Alexis. Lie and promise Eric F4. Point out how Nat manipulated Jason twice and he can't trust her. She has to be able to give them a reason to believe they could beat her. She did nothing but count on the HII. Parvati moves have given Amanda a chance to win.

If the Fans hadn't been dumb though Parv's moves would have cost them the game... Because they could have taken over. That's a fact... What's the point of taking out Ozzy, if it makes you lose your numbers? And I suspect that they could have convinced anyone, even people not in their alliance to vote out Ozzy...I highly doubt when Amanda was digging up that HI idol for dear life, that she was feeling that grateful to Parv for her moves in the game. Since they put a target on Amanda's back. And who says Ozzy would have necessarily won the shooting challenge for example. It's not like Ozzy had loads of competition challenge wise in Cook Islands.

Because Parvati made such a tight alliance with A/N, the fans were dumb enough to give up the numbers? 2 of the first 3 boots were favs. 4 fans made the merge and 3 of them made it a lot further than then would have without Parv. If Parvati's moves cost the fans their game now then they didn't play as well as Parvati. That's fact.

If Amanda was not grateful to Parv then that is why she is not such a great player. She may not have been sent to EI if not for Parvati. Parvati could have volunteered herself. This saved Amanda. It's their belief of what Ozzy could do whether he lived up to it is a different matter. He would have won it.