Dracula! (PBS: Feb. 11) in Other Shows that Suck Forum

0 Points

Dracula! (PBS: Feb. 11)

Started By	Comment
ObservingEgo	Dracula! (PBS: Feb. 11)	Lead	[-]
Posts: 10870 (02/05/07 12:53 PM) Hi, you two!!! : ) : ) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Remove this ad Hot damn...how will Masterpiece Theatre treat Vlad?
Gregoire	Re: Dracula! (PBS: Feb. 11)	#1	[-]
Posts: 37638 (02/05/07 01:07 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	This looks fun, and I like the angle it will be exploring: *Quote:* Drawing on themes that Bram Stoker hints at darkly in his 1897 novel, screenwriter Stewart Harcourt recasts the plot to focus on the Victorians' anxiety about sex and especially syphilis. Some scholars believe that Stoker himself died from syphilis, but the evidence is inconclusive. Nonetheless, the novel could not be more explicit about the invisible infection that seeps into the bloodstream and slowly turns its victims into demented fiends: which is what Dracula does to his prey and also what syphilis often produced in the age before antibiotics.
teenytiny83	Re: Dracula! (PBS: Feb. 11)	#2	[-]
Posts: 1562 (02/05/07 01:12 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Sounds interesting. Thanks I will check it out.
nuclear snake	Re: Dracula! (PBS: Feb. 11)	#3	[-]
Posts: 3097 (02/05/07 02:28 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Wow...sounds good.
Piranhahaha	Re: Dracula! (PBS: Feb. 11)	#4	[-]
Posts: 17265 (02/05/07 08:23 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Unlocked. This really does look good. Why is PBS airing this when the big Nets are cranking up for sweeps?
searcher86	> Re: Dracula! (PBS: Feb. 11)	#5	[-]
Posts: 6424 (02/05/07 11:41 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Why don't we have a thread for Masterpiece Theatre instead of each individual program they run?
Ipswich Ripper	Re: > Re: Dracula! (PBS: Feb. 11)	#6	[-]
Posts: 891 (02/05/07 11:58 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Dracula sucks.
ObservingEgo	Re: > Re: Dracula! (PBS: Feb. 11)	#7	[-]
Posts: 10870 (02/11/07 01:20 PM) Hi, you two!!! : ) : ) Reply Quote More Recent Posts
SirPaulMuaddib	Re: > Re: Dracula! (PBS: Feb. 11)	#8	[-]
Posts: 11110 (02/11/07 03:14 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Damn it...I almost forgot about this....want to catch it. ps. It's on at 9pm...and repeats at 4am....EST
StatelyWayneManor	Dracula	#9	[-]
Posts: 27093 (02/11/07 05:08 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Remove this ad Hey, Ripper. Dracula sucks AND bites. Is it just me or is Drac way too young in this version.
nuclear snake	Re: Dracula	#10	[-]
Posts: 3097 (02/11/07 11:29 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	They couldn't have cast a worse Dracula. He looked like Michael Jackson. Dracula should be dangerous and sexy. Van Helsing looked like Glen Close with a fake beard. It wasn't very good.
teenytiny83	Re: Dracula	#11	[-]
Posts: 1562 (02/11/07 11:59 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Fuck PBS. That Dracula was fucking gross. Why were there soo many closeups of his dirty fingertails? vomits The acting by everyone else was ok and I did like the syphiliis angle. The part at the end was cheesy though.
searcher86	> Re: Dracula	#12	[-]
Posts: 6424 (02/12/07 12:02 AM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	I didn't think it was so bad, but I wasn't expecting much based on reviews. I loved the campy over-the-top sexual symbolism. When Dracula split open the fig, I couldn't stop laughing. And the impaling of Lucy by her husband... If anything the story felt a bit rushed and could have used an extra half hour for some fleshing out. I couldn't see Van Helsing as Van Helsing, to me he was Inspector Poirot. Vlad's fingernails were dirty because sex was considered dirty.
teenytiny83	Re: > Re: Dracula	#13	[-]
Posts: 1562 (02/12/07 12:32 AM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	I got that. I didnt need the dirty fingernails. If that was what they were going for it was overkill. Plus the appeal of Drac is his sex appeal. Even without that he was still disgusting. The actor was miscast.
Chrissie	Dracula	#14	[-]
Posts: 141 (02/12/07 09:14 AM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	This was a horrible version... almost unwatchable. The casting was way off the mark and the acting (most of it) was laughable.
StatelyWayneManor	Re: Dracula	#15	[-]
Posts: 27093 (02/12/07 09:51 AM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	John Mayer with fangs. No thanks...
theraven49	Re: Dracula	#16	[-]
Posts: 120 (02/12/07 01:31 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	*Quote:* John Mayer with fangs. No thanks... LOL Agreed!
Pink Karnation	Re: Dracula	#17	[-]
Posts: 812 (02/12/07 02:12 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	I could only handle a few minutes of this. Give me Frank Langella and Gary Oldman ANYTIME, oh yeah!!!
sofa king	Re: Dracula! (PBS: Feb. 11)	#18	[-]
Posts: 3168 (06/17/07 02:34 AM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Remove this ad is there a better program than "Dracula"? i think not...

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

Dracula! (PBS: Feb. 11)

Dracula! (PBS: Feb. 11)