| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
shrewlaura |
|||
|
Why did they change Laurie so much in the movie? She lost her bitchy attitude and her smoking addiction.
|
|||
GrenadeJumper85 |
|||
|
So in the graphic novel Veidt unleashes a giant squid to help unite the nations as one instead of using the nuclear bomb things like in the movie? umm....
|
|||
HaroldBalzaccio |
|||
|
Just read the fucking book and/or shut the fuck up. You're embarrassing yourself.
|
|||
GrenadeJumper85 |
|||
|
How about you go fuck your mom.
|
|||
cindidindi76 |
|||
|
You can do better than that, GreJu.
|
|||
GrenadeJumper85 |
|||
|
I'm trying to get ready for tonight so I'm not at the top of my game at the current moment.
|
|||
bluesboi |
|||
|
So, have all you geeks cum in your pants yet?
|
|||
star jumper |
|||
cindidindi76 wrote: Actually, no he can't. |
|||
GrenadeJumper85 |
|||
|
Yes, we all don't have the infinite amount of time you do in perfecting your flames, some of us have lives.
|
|||
star jumper |
|||
|
Well seeing how I'm not deceased, or a cadaver, I have a life also.
|
|||
cindidindi76 |
|||
|
And then a "no life" flame?
|
|||
Pseudo Propaganda |
|||
shrewlaura wrote:Thank god. I actually hated her in the book. She was tolerable in the movie. |
|||
star jumper |
|||
cindidindi76 wrote: This is sadly his A-game, cindi. I'm thinking of mispelling a werd in this post so he can make a spelling flome. |
|||
Monsieur Muggles |
|||
|
She was tolerable, but man, this movie blew chunks. It dragged on for way too long at times, and the reliance on flashbacks worked in the books, but in the
movie it makes it seem super jumpy. It was 2h43m, and it definitely felt like that long.
|
|||
Vegazguy |
|||
|
loved it!!!!!!!! all this talk about how it lagged and shit is for fuckin' pussies. it was just right. i'll never look at another hung blue cock the
same way again.
|
|||
pandora111 |
|||
|
This movie just sucked ass. Rorschach was the only character with any charisma. Thank god I went were I could have a few drinks that made it slightly
tolerable. The most entertaining part of the whole night was some tard brought a baby who was no older than 1 and of course, he cried. Some guy shushed him
& then mother turned and said "no - YOU shush" like she should be there with a baby. Be a good parent & get a sitter, ASS.
|
|||
Emcee Batley |
|||
pandora111 wrote: yawn...... Anyone who complains about the length of a movie is quite simply a victim of A.D.D. or mental retardation. Stick to sitcoms, folks. |
|||
Monsieur Muggles |
|||
|
Let's make War & Peace the next novel made into a movie!
|
|||
pandora111 |
|||
Emcee Batley wrote: Now just where did I even mention or complain about the TIME of the movie??? It dragged and was just dismal.
|
|||
bluesboi |
|||
|
LOS ANGELES, Calif. -- Who watches the "Watchmen?" Audiences answered that question on Friday to the tune of $25.1 million at the box office for the highly anticipated superhero film. Its grosses included $4.6 million from midnight previews. The two hour, 41 minute film opened on 3,611 screens, the most ever for an R-rated movie, though it will likely fall below director Zack Synder's previous effort, 2007's "300," which earned $70 million during its opening weekend - a record for March openings. The long running time means that the film screens less times per day on each screen. Based on Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons' classic graphic novel, the journey of "Watchmen" to the big screen has been closely followed by fans. The film follows a group of cynical heroes as they investigate the murder of one of their own against the backdrop of societal dysfunction and looming nuclear war. The film faces no significant competition in the form of other new releases at the box office this weekend.
|
|||