| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
survivorisdabest |
|||
|
oh wow artie has pulled out another gem of a thread
|
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
Floater wrote:Good question, Floater. There are only SEVEN people on this entire board who have shown to have above average IQ by their posts: Olmec Donald CSCin3D Drboboosh2 oh ehm gee atee48 Jeff P3 ArtieeLange (btw thats me, Floater). Most of the rest are not just dumb, but dumb even for the internet. |
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
^I agree with you that the challenges are designed for certain players. I disagree that anything can be done about it.
|
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote: That's why you are not below average intelligence, like the rest of them. Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote:That's why you are not above average intelligence, like the Magnificent 7 |
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Whatever lets you sleep at night chief. Ironic though, since your system is entirly dependent on challenges. Aren't you basically admitting that luck is
unavoidable in that system?
|
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote:There is no luck in my system that isn't present in the current system. There is massive luck in the current system that is eliminated in my system. That this must be explained to you is why you are...average. |
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
It took you nearly a year to reach that somewhat comendable argument Art. Can't say I disagree with you with the second axiom, but I still laugh at the
fact that you need a luxery camp(an arbitrary device don't you think?) to intice people to win.
|
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote:No, it took you a year to understand it. Maybe in another year you will discuss that subject in that thread, and this threads subjects in this thread? |
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Really? It took you this long to admit that luck was prevelent in your system.
|
|||
Fatami |
|||
|
Has a weakling ever actually won the game? No, so it doesn't really matter regardless.
|
|||
ThrowMeGabon |
|||
|
The game was rigged for Susie like AS was rigged for Amber. No producer wants to see INVSs going to the finals, but shit happens. The variety of winning styles
of Survivor (and that includes weakling) is a good thing. Any argument against this is an argument for predictability.
|
|||
ExileIslander |
|||
|
|
|||
ExileIslander |
|||
ExileIslander wrote: |
|||
MajorTom |
|||
|
The thread title said there was some proof. I'm still waiting.
|
|||
taigark |
|||
|
You know, just because he said she use to build houses of cards doesn't mean she is GOOD at building houses of cards.
And besides, Bob won the season, so what's the point? |
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
Fatami wrote:The winner is determined by the Jury, stupid. Its the finals that are determined by the game design and the challenges, in this case a challenge that the producers knew one contestant had experience in, experience which she obviously used to win, get immunity, and therefore second place. Any other stupid questions? Next! |
|||
kishuu |
|||
|
And the final challenge wasn't rigged for Bob?
And guess what, Charlie said that the fire challenge took forever. Sugar was the only one getting sparks and it had gone on for over an hour before Susie could get a fire started. By then they were all 'ohmygod, just finish it already'. It's in his thread somewhere here or one of his interviews. |
|||
Missjolandaj |
|||
|
Ok, what if you're right and it was rigged...What happens now? You explode?
|
|||
O2JamFreak |
|||
|
another immortal, worthless thread.......all courtesy of the immortal himself "Artielange" a.k.a. "CBS'plant"
|
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
ArtieeLange wrote:
|
|||