| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 GretchenIsMyGod |
|||
|
Posts: 3172 (12/28/08 9:54 AM) Registered User |
7Sages wrote: A lot of shows that are already edited are later tweaked before airing for consistency with evolving plotlines. |
||
|
Quiddity |
|||
|
Posts: 4548 (01/03/09 3:11 PM) Registered User |
Gotta love some of these classic recent edgic quotes:
This is Guatemala 2.0... a season that we can't learn much from, and shouldn't change based upon. The lesson to be learned from Bob and Danni is that when the winner doesn't fit edgic guidelines, it doesn't matter what you do. The winner is going to be nearly impossible to predict in those seasons. What have I learned today? When you screw up royally, don't change anything you're doing, and that the winner is supposed to fit edgic's guidelines, not edgic is supposed to fit editing guidelines for the winners. Wow. |
||
|
ThrowMeGabon |
|||
|
Posts: 133 (01/03/09 3:34 PM) |
My confusion with edgic is that you all have the ultimate decision on who gets OTTN or UTRP. Your results are directly influenced by your opinions, not by
solid data, making results vast and randomly successful.
|
||
|
Thailandsurvivor |
|||
|
Posts: 4200 (01/03/09 3:35 PM) |
I'm not going to be bashing edgic anymore. Most of the people in edgic (who I know) I respect alot even if it's because of other reasons. They have
their right to enjoy themselves by trying to predict the winner if that's what they want to do. They can do this, of course, as long as it's kept in
that board. As great as it was to laugh at a couple certain posters when Susie flipped on Kota, I don't want to be told I'm wrong again because I dare
say Marcus 2.0 made a bad move and screwed over his game. As long as this happens, they can have their fun.
Last Edited By: Thailandsurvivor
01/03/09 5:11 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
 Kirblar |
|||
|
Posts: 7318 (01/03/09 3:40 PM) Registered user |
Quiddity wrote:Yeah. It's a morbid testament to human nature. |
||
