Had James not been injured last season, it very likely was going to be a F3 finish.According to one of Probst's blogs they had always intended an F2 for Fans Vs. Favorites. Here are his exact quotes on this issue (which was in the Ep. 13 blog--responding to fans who wrote comments:)
"To Dr. Zenith - thanks for the casting ideas, but I have to comment on the assertions that you and especially David Ellen (David, you made the blog!)
continue to make: that we manipulate the game so that our favorites can win. Is the medication you're currently taking prescribed or do you buy it on the
streets? If we could dictate who would win each season, then the following people never would have won: Tina in Australia, Vecepia in Marquesas, that soft-core
porno dude in Thailand, Jenna in the Amazon, Sandra in Pearl Islands, Amber in All-Stars, Earl in Fiji, and
Parvati in Fans vs Favorites! All of those just listed people definitely deserved to win because they played the best game, but that doesn't mean
they would have been our first choice to win. We would have picked more "colorful" winners. Plain and simple. I'm kind of stumped that people
still believe this stuff. ...Once and for all - the final three vs final two debate. It's a matter of choice. Personally I believe that when you have three
people in the final you have a better opportunity for a good winner because you cannot simply win the final immunity challenge and then take the least liked
person with you to the final vote. For instance, had we planned a final three in Fans vs Favorites, Cirie would have won and everybody would have been
happy. But we had a final two planned. So, David Ellen, if we were master manipulators, why not make it a final three and let Cirie win? Enough already.
That's just my opinion. For crying out loud, get over it."
And now I'm really over and out!













