WORST. WINNER. EVER.

0 Kudo

Started By	Comment
Mswldflwr		#141	[-]
Posts: 125 (12/16/08 12:18 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	WylDawg wrote: For people who are unhappy about Bob winning, remind yourself this: Bob only won because they screwed over the Onions with that last minute swap. That swap favored the Onions. They had three on each team. It all came down to Suzy flipping.
Pencake		#142	[-]
Posts: 12104 (12/16/08 12:40 PM) mwah Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Anything could have happened from that swap. It was half way into the friggin season for gosh darn sake! Bob
NeroRules		#143	[-]
Posts: 1017 (12/16/08 12:44 PM) Local user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	The twist with the switch did NOT ruin this season. As I said, we would never know the outcome if they had merged when they were supposed to. Susie may have still switched, and the HI could have come into play, Marcus could have still been voted out, we will NEVER know. If the Onions still managed to advance, I would not call any of them strategic masterminds except Marcus (and even that's still somewhat dubious with how easy they were making it for him), because they were all more than content to let him get to the end and win, so it would have been like a bunch of Sugars making moves to help Marcus win, wow great gameplay. And last but not least, Bob did NOT deserve to win, even he said HIMSELF that he did NO strategizing, what is so hard to understand about that? As soon as he said that, any other winner would have been more deserving, even Susie, and even Matty.
izad		#144	[-]
Posts: 4939 (12/16/08 1:28 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	I can't believe you guys are comparing Bob and Chris. At least Chris gave a fuck to lie all the way to the bitter end to actually win jury votes.
MultiGeminii		#145	[-]
Posts: 1321 (12/16/08 1:31 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Cassidy666 wrote: Hate to disagree but he was the least distasteful of the three options. Bob and Susie did what they needed to do to get to the end, and that was allow others to make dumbshit decisions. Bob actually had an alliance which was primed and sitting on the jury. Susie had no one and managed to make it there. I can't disagree with the votes that they got. Sugar rightly deserved nothing for being the worst possible finalist I've seen since fucking Dreamz. The most WTF, idiotic, emotional player EVER. It's true she made moves. All the absolute wrong ones. No one can deny her ability to fuck people over on a dime and lying to everyone and twisting the knife. Just fucking stupid. The right person won. Says the Corinne lover
Yeaster		#146	[-]
Posts: 5809 (12/16/08 2:42 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	izad wrote: I can't believe you guys are comparing Bob and Chris. At least Chris gave a fuck to lie all the way to the bitter end to actually win jury votes. X And people keep bringing up the twist, but the switch was God's gift to the onions and they still fucked it up. And besides, had NuFang lost that challenge, Matty would have without a doubt been voted out.
raidersfantom		#147	[-]
Posts: 2820 (12/18/08 10:43 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	MidnightPrince69 wrote: raidersfantom wrote: All those happy with a bob win get the fuck out of this thread. Hi, that wasn't very nice. On behalf of everyone else who doesn't give a flying fuck who won, please suck our collective dicks and have a nice day. :) That is not supposed to be nice and you asking me to suck your dick is not an insult, it is something on your Christmas wishlist So eww, old man Bob lover that you are, get the fuck out this thread and die plz, tia, foad
s 17 gabon		#148	[-]
Posts: 2 (04/26/09 7:32 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Susie did nothing the entire game. The winner was the best choice of the remaining three. At least Bob won shit :\
Krossedge		#149	[-]
Posts: 605 (04/26/09 7:43 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	s 17 gabon wrote: Susie did nothing the entire game. The winner was the best choice of the remaining three. At least Bob won shit :\ Yeah cause Sugar didn't run the entire game! She may have had no interest in winning, but seriously Sugar was the Puppeteer all season.
gervasemyman		#150	[-]
Posts: 1106 (04/26/09 7:48 PM) I'm with STUPID! Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Sugar was a bipolar mess. She got lucky the entire game and deserves nothing.
Pachinko		#151	[-]
Posts: 69 (04/26/09 7:49 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Krossedge wrote: s 17 gabon wrote: Susie did nothing the entire game. The winner was the best choice of the remaining three. At least Bob won shit :\ Yeah cause Sugar didn't run the entire game! She may have had no interest in winning, but seriously Sugar was the Puppeteer all season. That's the most hilarious shit i've ever read on this board. Thanks for the laffos ^^. Last Edited By: Pachinko 04/26/09 7:51 PM. Edited 1 times.
Emcee Batley		#152	[-]
Posts: 485 (04/26/09 8:00 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Survivor is not about strategy/alliances/blindsiding. It's about surviving. Bob survived 39 days and got 4 jury votes. He was a good winner because he was entertaining and deserved it. There is no rule in the handbook that says you have to play Richard Hatch's game.
Yesmar88		#153	[-]
Posts: 157 (04/26/09 8:09 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	I don't get why people get so upset when others say Sugar shouldn't have won. It's not an insult; she wasn't playing to win (by her own admission), so why should she? She made moves but they were to make good TV, not for strategy reasons. If we were giving awards to who made the best TV she'd get my vote, but that's not what you vote on in FTC. It's not an insult.
gervasemyman		#154	[-]
Posts: 1111 (04/26/09 8:12 PM) I'm with STUPID! Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Emcee Batley wrote: Survivor is not about strategy/alliances/blindsiding. It's about surviving. Bob survived 39 days and got 4 jury votes. He was a good winner because he was entertaining and deserved it. There is no rule in the handbook that says you have to play Richard Hatch's game. What the fuck? No one says he has to play like Hatch or even play a remotely strategic game. By all means, if the rest of the cast is dumb enough to let you win when you don't do shit strategically then great. But you will always be a BAD winner. Bob won, but we're allowed to say he was a bad winner. Because he was. And he was not entertaining nor did he deserve it. yw
Krossedge		#155	[-]
Posts: 609 (04/26/09 9:17 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	gervasemyman wrote: Emcee Batley wrote: Survivor is not about strategy/alliances/blindsiding. It's about surviving. Bob survived 39 days and got 4 jury votes. He was a good winner because he was entertaining and deserved it. There is no rule in the handbook that says you have to play Richard Hatch's game. What the fuck? No one says he has to play like Hatch or even play a remotely strategic game. By all means, if the rest of the cast is dumb enough to let you win when you don't do shit strategically then great. But you will always be a BAD winner. Bob won, but we're allowed to say he was a bad winner. Because he was. And he was not entertaining nor did he deserve it. yw Bob was hands down the worst winner ever. And YES, Sugar did do more than him you dumb fucking piece of shit, I would of rather had her win than Bob. Bob was just as bad as Sugar when it came to the not caring factor, Bob was the one who admitted during the season that he didn't care what place he came in! And Sugar definately dominated after the merge, even if it was dumb luck.
booga booga chicken george		#156	[-]
Posts: 323 (04/26/09 9:24 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	gervasemyman wrote: Emcee Batley wrote: Survivor is not about strategy/alliances/blindsiding. It's about surviving. Bob survived 39 days and got 4 jury votes. He was a good winner because he was entertaining and deserved it. There is no rule in the handbook that says you have to play Richard Hatch's game. What the fuck? No one says he has to play like Hatch or even play a remotely strategic game. By all means, if the rest of the cast is dumb enough to let you win when you don't do shit strategically then great. But you will always be a BAD winner. Bob won, but we're allowed to say he was a bad winner. Because he was. And he was not entertaining nor did he deserve it. yw no
hagiz1		#157	[-]
Posts: 570 (04/26/09 9:25 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Yesmar88 wrote: I don't get why people get so upset when others say Sugar shouldn't have won. It's not an insult; she wasn't playing to win (by her own admission), so why should she? She made moves but they were to make good TV, not for strategy reasons. If we were giving awards to who made the best TV she'd get my vote, but that's not what you vote on in FTC. It's not an insult. She may not playing to win but she's the mastermind essentially. She decided who goes and who's not. So as much as I hate her (she ruined Gabon) but she deserved that much more than Bob who just slept around during deciding who's going home, saying I'll vote whoever you guys vote (this is true, Charlie's word)
Emcee Batley		#158	[-]
Posts: 489 (04/26/09 9:28 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Krossedge wrote: gervasemyman wrote: Emcee Batley wrote: Survivor is not about strategy/alliances/blindsiding. It's about surviving. Bob survived 39 days and got 4 jury votes. He was a good winner because he was entertaining and deserved it. There is no rule in the handbook that says you have to play Richard Hatch's game. What the fuck? No one says he has to play like Hatch or even play a remotely strategic game. By all means, if the rest of the cast is dumb enough to let you win when you don't do shit strategically then great. But you will always be a BAD winner. Bob won, but we're allowed to say he was a bad winner. Because he was. And he was not entertaining nor did he deserve it. yw Bob was hands down the worst winner ever. And YES, Sugar did do more than him you dumb fucking piece of shit, I would of rather had her win than Bob. Bob was just as bad as Sugar when it came to the not caring factor, Bob was the one who admitted during the season that he didn't care what place he came in! And Sugar definately dominated after the merge, even if it was dumb luck. Bob, Susie, and Sugar all deserved to win. The requirement was to last 39 days and get 4 jury votes. Bob was deserving and entertaining.
gervasemyman		#159	[-]
Posts: 1119 (04/26/09 9:45 PM) I'm with STUPID! Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	You're fucked.
Emcee Batley		#160	[-]
Posts: 490 (04/26/09 9:46 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	gervasemyman wrote: You're fucked. You're bitter and dumb. That's like saying anyone other than Richard, Rudy, orSusan winning Borneo would be undeserving.

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

WORST. WINNER. EVER.

Quick Reply