| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 6428 (12/11/08 5:45 PM) Registered user |
CrystalSuxCox wrote: The sad thing is, they actually do ban alliances on foreign versions of Big Brother. |
||
|
Soviet |
|||
|
Posts: 17 (12/11/08 6:45 PM) |
What?
|
||
|
ArtieeLange |
|||
|
Posts: 463 (12/12/08 5:03 AM) |
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote:After you acknowledge I have designed a superior system based on the removal of artificial teams and their impact on a game called Survivor. After you acknowledge that neither you nor anyone else has a valid argument against my system. |
||
|
tdugan333 |
|||
|
Posts: 8816 (12/12/08 5:09 AM) |
Artiee technically you're the Prosecution here and 99.9% of us are the Defense on behalf of the current system so it's up to you to prove your case my
little rotund porcini...
|
||
|
ArtieeLange |
|||
|
Posts: 464 (12/12/08 8:03 AM) |
tdugan333 wrote:May I interpret for you, tdugan333? tdugan333 wrote:Guaranteed. Ironically its Sugars sister who appears to have eaten too much sugar. 
|
||
 SuperJude |
|||
|
Posts: 12124 (12/12/08 8:43 AM) Registered user |
Artiee - you've clearly been outed as some lamer who sits at home, likely alone, coming up with stupid theories they are too bitch ass pussy to put to the
test.
For shame, Artiee, for shame. -SJ™ |
||
|
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 6451 (12/12/08 8:58 AM) Registered user |
ArtieeLange wrote:  =
|
||
|
ArtieeLange |
|||
|
Posts: 465 (12/12/08 10:07 AM) |
SuperJude wrote:Did someone who has over 12000 posts, most of them from his "awards" thread, and manually appends every one of them with his "trademarked" initials signature just call me a lamer?
I will post again when I stop laughing at this SuperDouche in a few hours. (Reallly). |
||
|
SuperJude |
|||
|
Posts: 12125 (12/12/08 10:24 AM) Registered user |
Your pathetic attempts at flaming cannot cover up the fact you are weak minded and will not proactively test your so called "theory".
|
||
|
PrettyGoodYear1988 |
|||
|
Posts: 1568 (12/12/08 12:16 PM) Registered user |
Yeah... ORG, Artiee. ORG!
Get foulmouthedleon to do it or something. |
||
|
tdugan333 |
|||
|
Posts: 8821 (12/12/08 4:06 PM) |
Artiee my beloved, I am everso disappointed that you used the "number of posts flame". For shame Artiee. I would have had totally closed my heart
to you forever except that you redeemed yourself with the billion laughy blue fuckers. So did I miss you finally answering the question why on earth would
someone vote out the weakest people under your system from the losing tribe?
|
||
|
SurvivorArctic |
|||
|
Posts: 13194 (12/12/08 4:18 PM) Not a team player
|
The 'OMG YOU HAVE SO MANY POSTS IS THAT ALL YOU DO ALL DAY???' flame is about as lame as one can get.
|
||
|
ArtieeLange |
|||
|
Posts: 466 (12/12/08 4:51 PM) |
tdugan333 wrote:Everyone on the losing tribe is "weak" (your word), because they just failed to reach the top half of the challenge. Everyone deserves to be vulnerable, but only one of them deserves to be voted out: The "weakest" one at the social game. Guaranteed. |
||
|
tdugan333 |
|||
|
Posts: 8824 (12/12/08 9:49 PM) |
My smoochie poochie answered a question? My heart be still. <3
|
||
|
PrettyGoodYear1988 |
|||
|
Posts: 1592 (12/12/08 10:16 PM) Registered user |
And in the current system, everyone on the losing tribe is "weak" because they did not work together as a team and did not beat the other tribe.tdugan333 wrote: Thus, everyone deserves to be vulnerable. It could be the person that was most responsible for losing the challenge, or the brat who has a bad attitude, or the person who does no work around camp, or the guy who thinks he's calling the shots when his leadership is actually bad for the team, or the person who just happened to cross a power-hungry guy's alliance. Either way, if you get voted out, for whatever reason, you deserve it. Guaranteed. |
||
|
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
Posts: 7194 (12/12/08 10:19 PM) |
Doing anything that could hurt the weaker players would lessen the chances of epic moments like this:
|
||
|
ArtieeLange |
|||
|
Posts: 467 (12/13/08 5:02 AM) |
PrettyGoodYear1988 wrote:Really? PrettyGoodYear1988 wrote:
Thanks for proving, yet again, that there are no valid arguments against my system. |
||
|
ArtieeLange |
|||
|
Posts: 468 (12/13/08 9:09 AM) |
Kitty Pryde1 wrote:You actually just proved my point, again. The system you want would lower that hoop for the weaklings, making it easier for them to win. My system makes everything equal, because only then is it entertaining to watch players struggle, and fail, like that mammoth just did. It's great watching her fuck-up, but under the current system she could actually win, and that's (been) the ratings-killing mockery of Survivor. It's not about "doing anything" to the weaker players, its about not doing anything forced or artificial and letting the players determine their own game and status.
Last Edited By: ArtieeLange
12/13/08 9:23 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
PrettyGoodYear1988 |
|||
|
Posts: 1596 (12/13/08 9:30 AM) Registered user |
Jacquie got screwed because of a tribe switch that isolated her from her allies and put an intrinsic target on her back. Granted, it wasn't an impossible situation to get out of (people have survived such switches before), but it did make it more of an uphill battle for her on New Fang. Either way, that's a completely different situation, idiot. |
||
|
Everything is Eventual |
|||
|
Posts: 4369 (12/13/08 9:39 AM) Registered user |
PrettyGoodYear1988 wrote:so, that's what you think about the wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy past... what do you think about now...present day. |
||
