TheresNoPlaceLike 127 0 0 1 wrote:that was hilarious!!!
Soledad� was almost as bad as faux news.
<omitted on purpose>
1 stifled vote McCain = split a little more towards Obama. LOL
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Vegazguy |
|||
TheresNoPlaceLike 127 0 0 1 wrote:that was hilarious!!! |
|||
buckitex |
|||
B DeBrun wrote: The sentence stating only 6% of insured workers have insurance costs that meet the threshold used is very telling to me. I know my Family policy costs more than $12k. I think you will end up with fewer people insured, especially in large city markets where insurance costs more than in rural area. I think in the long run all this will accomplish is to create more uninsured people which drives up the cost on insurance for people like me who do have it. |
|||
Vicconius |
|||
TheresNoPlaceLike 127 0 0 1 wrote: They didn't show the whole room on camera. What was more funny was the old lady pulling her husband's hand down when he put it up for McCain, then putting two hands up when voting for Obama. Typical democrat gerrymandering. |
|||
blockhose |
|||
|
Like Republicans don't gerrymander.
C'mon people - let's quit the bullshit. |
|||
Vegazguy |
|||
Vicconius wrote:what a normal citizen can't show excitement for her candidate?����� typical republican. |
|||
B DeBrun |
|||
buckitex wrote: I printed it out and I'm going to read it, but I couldn't help but note on page 3, the deficit impact of the health care policy for both candidates are in negative numbers: McCain is -$54 to -$65 billion Obama is -$65 billion I'm going to guess the above you cited falls under the tax policy: McCain is -$417 to -$485 billion. Obama, -$360 billion. Energy policy for both is $0. I'm laughing about that for some reason. And last, Other Spending/Savings: Obama is +$38 billion. McCain is +$183 to $196 billion. ETA: Obama's plan will lead to a deficit of $33 billion more than McCain's plan.
Last Edited By: B DeBrun
10/03/08 10:30 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
ohboy |
|||
|
the only polls that matter are the random polls...the others are just a reflection of who watches where....
Who Won VP Debate: A Review of Polls |
|||
Sloansalad |
|||
|
woah there's a whole fucking page of copying and pasting!
|
|||
Gregoire |
|||
|
Because of Sarah Palin's mentioning of Civil War general George McClellan and his stance on a surge in Afghanistan, I pulled a book on the history of Civil
War off my shelf this morning and started reading it. Thank you Sarah!
|
|||
buckitex |
|||
Gregoire wrote: She's all for education, Dontcha Know! |
|||
finishthemoff |
|||
Gregoire wrote: IF he ever run our army, he wouldn't even be able to conquer Baghdad by now. |
|||
B DeBrun |
|||
Gregoire wrote: meanwhile history textbooks in blue states have renamed a famous attack at Gettysburg as "Pickett's Surge" |
|||
finishthemoff |
|||
B DeBrun wrote: |
|||
CanIBreathe |
|||
|
Rugslug send those gaffs to sean hannity. maybe he'll pay attention to you since noone here is.
|
|||
Little Boy |
|||
Gregoire wrote:When you're done reading it tell us how it ends. |
|||
The Virgin Murray |
|||
blockhose wrote: The fallacy in your question is the asumption that anyone wants to "pin all their hopes on drilling." I don't know what language conservatives need to speak to make you guys understand that we think domestic drilling should be one part of a comprehensive energy plan that includes nuclear, solar, wind, tides and whatever else but cannot simply eliminate oil overnight. And the more oil we develop here, the stronger we will be financially. It's not like we've said it once or twice. We've said it here and every Republican politician has said it over and over again. And still we get questions incredulously asking how we can pin all our hopes on drilling. I think "environmentalists" who are engaged enough to make significant lobbying efforts have lost touch with anything resembling reasonable compromises. I don't think there is anything cartoonish about them. They are the far left who use the environment as a tool to leverage their agenda of bringing capitalism to its knees. |
|||
finishthemoff |
|||
|
I'm sure that she will mistake an incident off the Horn of Africa for feared CSA raider, Alabama.
|
|||
X Bilkis |
|||
|
after extensively studying the civil war over the course of a year, i feel safe in saying that george mcclellan owns.
"Those in whose judgment I rely tell me that I fought the battle splendidly and that it was a masterpiece of art. ... I feel I have done all that can be asked in twice saving the country. ... I feel some little pride in having, with a beaten & demoralized army, defeated Lee so utterly. ... Well, one of these days history will I trust do me justice." -- george mcclellan, after being a total pussy at antietam he also said the country wasn't ready for him to lead it when he lost the election and thought that he was always outnumbered. he thought all the confederate generals were amazing except lee. he thought washington had it out for him and like, 3 days after taking over the army of the potomac he gave lincoln a comprehensive plan telling him how to run the war. he ruled. |
|||
Gregoire |
|||
When you're done reading it tell us how it ends. I'm only one third into it, but it looks like the South is going to win! Which is great because they have great food down there. |
|||
finishthemoff |
|||
X Bilkis wrote: And his toughest opponent was John B. Magruder |
|||