An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals

0 Kudo

Started By	Comment
ArtieeLange		#641	[-]
Posts: 94 (06/22/08 7:14 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	oh ehm gee wrote: When the host can beat up a "Survivor" winner, the game fails. Now go count how many winners can take Jeff Probst in a fight. So you're basically saying women winning makes the game fail? When the male host can beat up a male "Survivor" winner, the game fails. That brings up another point why RW/RR is better; they separate the guys from the girls in the vote-off competitions. So then I will say when a female RW/RR winner can beat up a female Survivor winner, the game fails. doc wrote: Parv could take him. Parv spent her time on a show called Survivor sun-bathing. The game sucks. You suck. Just because you have posters of her hanging over your bed doesn't mean she did anything great.
doc		#642	[-]
Posts: 120 (06/23/08 11:58 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	I think it's really odd, that being able to beat up Probst is how you judge players. She's a boxer, I think she can take care of herself. No posters over my bed, but wondering what Survivor studs are hanging over your bed.
ArtieeLange		#643	[-]
Posts: 95 (06/23/08 4:43 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	doc wrote: I think it's really odd, that being able to beat up Probst is how you judge players. That should be part of the game, Surviving a Jeff Probst attack, it would weed out pussies like you. doc wrote: She's a boxer Foxy-boxing is not a sport.
doc		#644	[-]
Posts: 121 (06/23/08 7:08 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Before you were praising Eliza. Now you want to kick her out. Because she's pretty small, like Parvati, so unless she can use her puzzle solving ability or death rays fire out of her alien eyes, my money is on Jeff.
ArtieeLange		#645	[-]
Posts: 96 (06/23/08 8:55 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	doc wrote: Before you were praising Eliza. Now you want to kick her out. Because she's pretty small, like Parvati, so unless she can use her puzzle solving ability or death rays fire out of her alien eyes, my money is on Jeff. 1) Don't ever compare Eliza to Parvati again. 2) I explained any male winner who could be beaten up by Probst the host is not a Survivor. 3) Then I said Survivor could take a hint from RW/RR which makes the end challenges guy vs guy, and girl vs girl. Survivor could have a male AND female winner - Survivors. Each suited to differed qualities. Or one brawn and one brain Survivor. Then you can eliminate the semi-permanent teams without bitching that the weaker and the older won't have a chance...since thats why the team part exists anyway. I am full of ideas, doc, whereas youre just full of shit.
doc		#646	[-]
Posts: 124 (06/23/08 9:38 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Wow , you're having a mental meltdown. Five foot one Parv sucks, because she can't beat up Probst, even though it's only important that the guys are able to beat him up. And now you want 2 winners, even thgough the title is SOUL survivor, Soul means 1. And the reason is because the women aren't strong enough to take on the guys and the guys can't match the women in the smarts department.
goose		#647	[-]
Posts: 120 (06/23/08 9:51 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	doc wrote: And now you want 2 winners, even thgough the title is SOUL survivor, Soul means 1. SOUL
ArtieeLange		#648	[-]
Posts: 97 (06/24/08 6:07 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	doc wrote: it's only important that the guys are able to beat him up. Right. doc wrote: Five foot one Parv sucks, because she can't beat up Probst Wrong. She sucks because she is weak stupid and kinda dull. doc wrote: now you want 2 winners It's an idea, this way you can separate the challenges and have a physical winner and intellectual winner...like The Professor on Gilligans Island, At the very least, this will guarantee two worthy winners, instead of one overall winner who fails at both physical AND intellectual. And now its time to laugh: doc wrote: the title is SOUL survivor, Soul means 1.
oh ehm gee		#649	[-]
Posts: 1131 (06/24/08 10:54 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	ArtieeLange wrote: It's an idea, this way you can separate the challenges and have a physical winner and intellectual winner...like The Professor on Gilligans Island, At the very least, this will guarantee two worthy winners, instead of one overall winner who fails at both physical AND intellectual. And now its time to laugh: No, that was time to laugh. Given that you know oh so much about the television industry, I'm sure you're just posting that for laffos, since giving away a second million is fairly cost-ineffective in terms of improving ratings/getting more advertisers/making a profit. Or else you plan on giving away $500 grand each, which would make it less worth competing for (if Survivor were only for $500 grand, I'd totally do BB in a heartbeat instead). Two other things: 1) Parvati sucks because she enjoys it. and 2) The fact that you didn't make a Vee joke at "Soul Survivor" makes me suspect that you have watched points from the beginning.
ArtieeLange		#650	[-]
Posts: 98 (06/24/08 7:00 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	oh ehm gee wrote: giving away $500 grand each, which would make it less worth competing for RW/RR winners get around 10% of that and they compete their asses off. oh ehm gee wrote: giving away a second million is fairly cost-ineffective in terms of improving ratings/getting more advertisers/making a profit. If you knew about the tv industry, you would know that networks spend more than that paying sitcom actors...per episode. oh ehm gee wrote: 1) Parvati sucks because she enjoys it. and 2) The fact that you didn't make a Vee joke at "Soul Survivor" makes me suspect that you have watched points from the beginning. >
oh ehm gee		#651	[-]
Posts: 1132 (06/24/08 8:00 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	RW/RR winners get around 10% of that and they compete their asses off. RW/RR winners also get to compete in multiple challenges - would you like to cut the prize down to 50K and allow for past players to compete in every season (whether it be a full ASS or new vs. old), because it will pretty much become watching Rupert, Amanda and Mariano lose over and over. Additionally, few of those people have jobs other than doing challenges and speaking in colleges. If you knew about the tv industry, you would know that networks spend more than that paying sitcom actors...per episode. I most certainly did, but thanks. Not to mention, most sitcom actors that can afford to pay their actors that much probably have decent ratings, making it a worthwhile expense. It would be completely different to try and fix a sinking ship (as you feel Survivor has become) by trying to add another million dollars to it when there are cheaper alternatives (better casting). And the Vee comment was meant to be a joke. I'm sorry that you felt the need to make it in to some random comparison when it was just me making the easy joke you wouldn't go for based upon the events of that season (srsly, my mom stopped watching after ASS and she remembers how religious Vee was). FWIW Vee pwning Neleh = Coral pwning Holly in BOTS. Last Edited By: oh ehm gee 06/24/08 8:06 PM. Edited 1 times.
doc		#652	[-]
Posts: 128 (06/24/08 8:52 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	OMG, I made a mistake in grammar. That's never happens in Sucks. How can I live with myself? I'd like some advice, Artie. How do you live with being such a dipshit you can't the simple concept that your system would make the strong even bigger targets? Wonder why RR/RW has lower prizes than Survivor? Could it be because Survivor is top 20 show, and RR/RW is on MTV? Probably. Survivors earn their money. Ami's almost recovered from 2 torn ligaments in her leg that didn't take her out of the game. Dehydration, malnutrition, Parasites, and they're still standing 10 hours on a pole or something. They are truly amazing people, they completely have my respect (except for Osten) for the shit they go through. And then some want to go again, some for a third time. Where do RW/RR contestants live and what do they eat?
ArtieeLange		#653	[-]
Posts: 99 (06/25/08 2:49 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	oh ehm gee wrote: RW/RR winners also get to compete in multiple challenges Which has nothing to do with the level they compete at (or the level they are tested) during each challenge and each season. oh ehm gee wrote: And the Vee comment was meant to be a joke. I know, I just needed an excuse to post Corals pic for poor lil doc.
XXWildcat	Counter Proposal	#654	[-]
Posts: 238 (06/25/08 2:36 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	I make a counter proposal that the people who created the Wipeout obstacle courses be hired by Survivor and bring a lot more humor to challenges. I laffed my ass off at these idiots...............unlike I did at this thread and it's length.
ArtieeLange		#655	[-]
Posts: 100 (06/26/08 1:03 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	doc wrote: Dehydration, malnutrition, Parasites, and they're still standing 10 hours on a pole or something. They are truly amazing people As always you are half-right, half-stupid. The ones that stand on a pole for 10 hours ARE amazing. They should be rewarded, with temp immunity and the winners camp. The ones that dont are weak, and should be penalized by going to TC, and one of these weaklings get booted, and then the losers camp.
doc		#656	[-]
Posts: 136 (06/26/08 7:29 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Yet Paarvati did win a stamina contest, even though it took a deal to do it. And Ozzy was 1 of the first out because of his bum shoulder. So under your system he'd become vulnerable and would have been gone, just like in the game. Someone like Ozzy needs to win every challenge. Under the current system, it's dumb to get rid of Ozzy during the team phase, and if he was a better strategic player, a more complete player, he could have avoided the blindside and maybe won the game. There is no reason Tom should have won. Since he did he must be a pretty good social player, unlike Ozzy or Terry.
ArtieeLange		#657	[-]
Posts: 101 (06/26/08 8:42 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	doc wrote: under your system he'd become vulnerable and would have been gone Under my system, if you lose you deserve to be vulnerable. However, those who lose are not "gone" simply because they lose, because if they lose they are not threats. doc wrote: Someone like Ozzy needs to win every challenge You only think that because you know Ozzy is a threat. No one knew that until he started winning challenges. Dummy. doc wrote: Under the current system, it's dumb to get rid of Ozzy during the team phase Under the current system, the team-phase is the only opportunity for losers to get rid of threats. Dummy.
m0t0 maj1		#658	[-]
Posts: 595 (06/26/08 10:31 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	LOL No buyers still? yawns
doc		#659	[-]
Posts: 138 (06/26/08 10:47 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Under my system, if you lose you deserve to be vulnerable. However, those who lose are not "gone" simply because they lose, because if they lose they are not threats. What? Are you serious? You Can't see how someone would a threat at a bunch of Challenges, but some random challenge they might not be? Noone will be in the top each time. Remmber the IC in China that Courtney won. I made a mistake, in that challenge I mentioned before, Ozzy would not have been in the losers group. The order they went down was Cirie/Erik, Alexis, Nat, James, then Ozzy. So Ozzy would just barely make the winners group, but look at who went out just before he did, James. I bet he becomes a target now, huh? doc wrote: Someone like Ozzy needs to win every challenge You only think that because you know Ozzy is a threat. No one knew that until he started winning challenges. Dummy. So let's start ICs sooner., So the threats are made clear sooner. It's a little hazy when it still a team competition. doc wrote: Under the current system, it's dumb to get rid of Ozzy during the team phase Under the current system, the team-phase is the only opportunity for losers to get rid of threats. Dummy. It is the best chance, except they don't unless your leader has their brains rotted out by steroids. For the Millionth time, in the team game you keep strength, helps win challenges. Why is that so hard to understand? Every survivor ever to play the game gets that. Every fan over the age of 5 gets it. But the whole world and Survivor history is wrong, you're right. Just 1 example would be nice.
ArtieeLange		#660	[-]
Posts: 102 (06/26/08 6:09 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	doc wrote: Noone will be in the top each time. Which proves the fairness and variable results of my system. The more they get into the top half, the more immunity they have. The more they fall into the bottom half, the less they are seen as a threat. The only thing that matters is every player will have much more control over their own fate then they do now, and the reason for that is the team system, and the reason for that is to keep weaklings and losers around, so as not to alienate the weakling loser viewers, and the result of that is it alienates everyone else, and the result of that is 1 million less viewers per season. doc wrote: For the Millionth time, in the team game you keep strength, helps win challenges. Why is that so hard to understand? Every survivor ever to play the game gets that. Every fan over the age of 5 gets it. But the whole world and Survivor history is wrong, you're right. Just 1 example would be nice. How about 2 examples...from the most recent season...of the weakest, worst players ever. Read this entire thread again, dummy. Last Edited By: ArtieeLange 10/07/20 3:14 PM. Edited 1 times.

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals

Quick Reply