An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals

0 Kudo

Started By	Comment
kenc333		#601	[-]
Posts: 2195 (06/17/08 9:39 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	ArtieeLange wrote: She was on Survivor, and won Survivor, because of her only assets displayed in her bikini. Thats fine for ANTM. The point is not that she is a weak and stupid, but that she won by being nothing more than weak and stupid. If she could win under my rules, then she deserves a pat on her ass. If Parvati's stupid, what's that make you? ...I guess that explains how you came up with such a terrible idea. You're just a sexist bitch who really needs to stop posting and complaining about how women can win Survivor.
ArtieeLange		#602	[-]
Posts: 82 (06/17/08 10:31 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	doc wrote: she could win under your rules In the last and most important challenge of the game, she came in third and last place. If there was a 3 way with Cirie in the finale, she would have come in second place.
doc		#603	[-]
Posts: 91 (06/17/08 10:40 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	She comes in third, so she gets second? What are your rules for the final 4 ?
m0t0 maj1		#604	[-]
Posts: 587 (06/17/08 10:43 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Are we still doing this???!?? Troll.Feed.No.
doc		#605	[-]
Posts: 92 (06/17/08 10:58 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	We shouldn't, but it's amusing. Actually, I don't think he's serious. Noone could be that clueless.
ArtieeLange		#606	[-]
Posts: 83 (06/18/08 3:26 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	doc wrote: She comes in third, so she gets second? wtf. She came in third in the final three challenge, and would have come in second if there was a final three Tribal. Are you always so easily confused? doc wrote: What are your rules for the final 4 ? Are you always so easily confused? Post-merge the current game works because it is individual challenge. The problem is that what remains is sad and weak. Maybe not compared to you, doc, but they would be the first to go on an equal playing field.
ArtieeLange		#607	[-]
Posts: 84 (06/18/08 10:09 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	kenc333 wrote: If Parvati's stupid, what's that make you? .. uh...someone who noticed how stupid she is? Your question is stupid too, what's that make you?
kenc333		#608	[-]
Posts: 2209 (06/18/08 10:16 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	ArtieeLange wrote: kenc333 wrote: If Parvati's stupid, what's that make you? .. uh...someone who noticed how stupid she is? Your question is stupid too, what's that make you? Someone who didn't come up with the worst idea in Sucks history.
Kitty Pryde1		#609	[-]
Posts: 4769 (06/18/08 10:54 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Artiee, did you not fucking understand his question? He was asking what happens, under YOUR SYSTEM, when they reach the final 4. Does it become a completely individual game, or do they still compete and have the strongest be immune and the weakest got the tribalc council?
ArtieeLange		#610	[-]
Posts: 85 (06/18/08 3:59 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Kitty Pryde1 wrote: under YOUR SYSTEM, when they reach the final 4. Does it become a completely individual game, or do they still compete and have the strongest be immune and the weakest got the tribalc council? Either way works, it doesn't really matter because by that point, any of the remaining four will be worthy of winning the game because my system weeds out the weaklings.
m0t0 maj1		#611	[-]
Posts: 588 (06/18/08 4:17 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	So they are not weaklings? What if there is a challenge like the one in the premiere of Exile Island, who will win if it was individual? Let's say there are only 8 talismans?
kenc333		#612	[-]
Posts: 2218 (06/18/08 4:43 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Artiee = Joel?
doc		#613	[-]
Posts: 94 (06/18/08 5:23 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	No, Terry, he felt entitled to that money got farther but lost to Danielle. Was a Crushing blow. Call a whaambulance. Terry's on sucks crying
ArtieeLange		#614	[-]
Posts: 86 (06/18/08 5:49 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	m0t0 maj1 wrote: So they are not weaklings? What if there is a challenge like the one in the premiere of Exile Island, who will win if it was individual? Let's say there are only 8 talismans? wtf are you talking about. "talismans" ?
m0t0 maj1		#615	[-]
Posts: 589 (06/18/08 11:18 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	ArtieeLange wrote: m0t0 maj1 wrote: So they are not weaklings? What if there is a challenge like the one in the premiere of Exile Island, who will win if it was individual? Let's say there are only 8 talismans? wtf are you talking about. "talismans" ? WTF I'm asking a valid question.
ArtieeLange		#616	[-]
Posts: 87 (06/19/08 9:21 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	doc wrote: Terry How many times are you gonna name-drop Terry? Are you obsessed with him? Are you in love with him?
Kitty Pryde1		#617	[-]
Posts: 4796 (06/19/08 10:45 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Well under YOUR system, the game becomes completely individual at the final 4, right? Well that that point, you'd basically have the two strongest players (Ozzy/Erik) and two of the weakest players (Tracy/Cirie) left in the game. Regardless of who would win immunity, they weak players would work with one of the strong players work to vote the other strong player out, leaving a final 3 of two weak and one strong. And then you either have a final 3 in which the jury votes for one of the losers to win because they had to strategize more, or another challenge leading, most likely to a weak vs. strong showdown, in which the odds favor the weak player winning. As much as I would love to see Tracy or Cirie win, there are too many fans out there like you who have hard-ons for alpha males and immunity whores, so the ratings would drop even MORE than they do now.
ArtieeLange		#618	[-]
Posts: 88 (06/19/08 3:23 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Kitty Pryde1 wrote: you'd basically have the two strongest players (Ozzy/Erik) and two of the weakest players (Tracy/Cirie) left in the game Where to begin correcting you. Once again your ass-umptions get the better of you, assuming that the teams under my system will remain stable, assuming the same players will always win and lose challenges, assuming you can predict the final 4, and your BIGgest ASSumption is that assuming any final 4 under my system would have "weak" players. Even accepting all your silly assumptions, the final 2 of each group will have beaten everyone else in their respective team, whether they remained uniform or not, which doesn't matter.
tubecam		#619	[-]
Posts: 98 (06/19/08 3:57 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Why would anyone watch the show at all if it was just a parade of predictable eliminations? Is there much drama in what order Yau-Man, Eliza, Kathy and Chet get voted out? Eliza Rawked all the puzzle challenges, and balance but not being "Strong" she deserves no place in Artie's Show which is nothing like Survivor.
Kitty Pryde1		#620	[-]
Posts: 4825 (06/19/08 4:11 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	You're the one who wants the game to be all about challenges. Honestly, you're talking like you think Chet deserves a fair chance under your system, yet you act like Chet would be one of the first boots which he wouldn't be.

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals

Quick Reply