| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
XtremeInnovator420 |
|||
|
I can see it now: "The final 4 is perfect because it prevents someone from bringing 1 or 2 unlikeable people to the end with them. It'll be here to
stay and there's no need to change it."
|
|||
PKFA |
|||
Are you kidding? Final 3 is way too many people. It makes the end game look very crowded. What's next? A final 4?It only looked crowded in Cook Islands and Fiji because of the ridiculously large juries. The return to the seven-person jury in China helped immensely. Granted, both CI and Fiji were terrible seasons, but can you imagine how much worse they would've been using the F2? Instead of getting a completely predictable vote between Becky and Ozzy/Yul, we got a 5-4 split between the two most dominant people out there. And a predictable but deserving winner in Earl, rather than having to pick between Dreamz and Cassandra. Part of the reason I think it worked so well in those two cases is that the players had it sprung on them at the last minute and couldn't plan for it long-term. Now that every player knows they're aiming for the final three, they'll have to play extra hard to try and get two goats there with them instead of just one. It requires a lot more pre-thought than just planning on taking out the best player at F3, and I, for one, don't mind watching it at all. |
|||
Jericoholic43 |
|||
|
Didnt the sponsor not like what happened with the whole dreamz and Yau man thing and thats why they wont sponsor anymore??
|
|||
The Very Insane Shark |
|||
Probst has said in interviews that he sees no reason to ever return to the using a final two. The final three is here to stay, and with the exception of a possible tie vote, I personally don't think there's anything wrong with it. |
|||
mschweber |
|||
Probst has said in interviews that he sees no reason to ever return to the using a final two. The final three is here to stay, and with the exception of a possible tie vote, I personally don't think there's anything wrong with it. Lesson learned: don't trust anything that comes out of Probst's mouth. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At the end of the day Probst is hired help. He is not the one making the decisions |
|||
howiekendrick |
|||
|
They should bring back the song that played in the "Honor the Fallen" sequences up through Season 8, I believe it was. That was a great piece of
music.
|
|||
hagiz1 |
|||
mschweber wrote: Uhm yeah he is one of the producer now,so he is making some of the decisions along with several creative producers. |
|||
foulmouthedleon |
|||
|
They need luxury items back (or to at least show them on the show) and the gong from Borneo. Everyone should have to hit the gong before going to TC.
|
|||
mschweber |
|||
hagiz1 wrote: The entertainment industry gives out Producer credits the way banks give out Vice President titles. Everyone gets one because they are cheap to give and
make people feel important. When push comes to shove there is one person making the decisions on Survivor and it ain't Jeff Probst.
|
|||
Syoma |
|||
|
Snuffing the runner up's torch.
|
|||
hagiz1 |
|||
mschweber wrote: if you really know anything. It's the title "Associate Producer" that the industry gives out to everyone that's helping but not important whatsoever. the title "producer" in TV industry is actually the important one, coz they're the one running the show under the show runner. |
|||
The Very Insane Shark |
|||
Snuffing the runner up's torch. Yeah...I miss that aspect as well. I always thought it helped to bring closure to the season. |
|||
Sol Rosenberg |
|||
Syoma wrote: When was the last time they did this? It's been a while, no? |
|||
Syoma |
|||
|
Thailand
--------------------- I want to bring back the taped winner reveal,just like Borneo. |
|||
m0t0 maj1 |
|||
|
I wish they'd bring back the Luxury Items.I think the reason why they removed it is that it gave some tribes people an advantage.
Mama Kim with the colored mosquito nets Vee with her journal. At the very least, they should limit them. I don't think having a chapstick would hurt |
|||
ItsChevy |
|||
|
Yes, I agree...That they should have at least One Luxury item ...
|
|||
Syoma |
|||
|
Bring back the Glittery gold and pink buffs because it makes the men felt awkward.
|
|||
XtremeInnovator420 |
|||
|
....And a purple buff doesn't? But seriously, they should bring back luxury items. I mean...say someone brings a black sharpie to I dunno...count the days
or something. How is that going to give them an advantage?
|
|||
agent2424 |
|||
|
Posts: 2900 (05/30/08 11:56 PM) Registered user |
on an SOS challenge they can color ummm something all black? lol that's the best excuse i could come up with.
I agree bring back Luxury items! |
||
DiversityFan |
|||
|
l don't know if this ever happened, but they should do a preshow ware every player gets a confessonal and talk about the way they will play the game.
|
|||