Which reminds me, I'll be the first to attempt some ratings for the finale... these could be way off, but somebody's gotta go first...
Dabu
Amanda - CPP5
Cirie - MORP4
Natalie - CP3
Parvati - CPM4
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
astroline |
|||
|
Briand, you can definitely post your own chart every once in a while. We all know and accept that Warrior's chart is the official one, some of us just like
to post our own because we take the time to do so to reflect our own ratings and winner picks. I was doing my own chart for the Cooks before I even started
actually posting here!
Which reminds me, I'll be the first to attempt some ratings for the finale... these could be way off, but somebody's gotta go first... Dabu Amanda - CPP5 Cirie - MORP4 Natalie - CP3 Parvati - CPM4 |
|||
scepticA |
|||
|
Briand, I don't think there's any rule about posting or not posting your own personal rating chart. The only requests: Don't make it huge (I hate
horizontal scrolling, cuz it affects all the other posts on the page) and to label it as your own ratings. Other than that, cool. I like seeing how others
have rated players over time.
flf, chap, etc. - does that sound OK? |
|||
chad6 |
|||
|
I don't think Amanda was P. Her blowup toward Cirie, her crying (that we were told was fake), and the negative things the jury said about her (face is
glazed over, your not genuine, superficial). But, I do believe she had P moments as well.
So, I think Amanda gets a CPM5 |
|||
AllMenAreIslands |
|||
|
Well, if Parvati's little comments in even 1 or 2 of her UTR rated eps were actually wee game-related gems, then she should not have been rated UTR.
I'm not saying all her UTRs were wrong, but the doubt that some folks had around here was tied in part to the string of them. And I don't recall her
being that "fluffy."
On the plus side, I was SO pleased to see more people using the array of ratings. CP1 and CP2, MOR1 and MOR2, even a UTR3 at one point. Even if those ratings didn't always make it onto the majority chart, it was refreshing and pleasing to see more people really working the range, as necessary. All in all, a great season!! Briand, I see no reason why you shouldn't post your own chart. Just put your name on it. |
|||
McPhever224 |
|||
|
Dabu
Amanda - CPP5 Cirie - MORM4 Natalie - CP3 Parvati - CPM5 |
|||
LKMOSCAR |
|||
|
No one was MOR this last episode.
|
|||
McPhever224 |
|||
LKMOSCAR wrote: I just didn't see Cirie as strategic as a whole. |
|||
briand73 |
|||
|
Great. When next season rolls around I'll be asking the best way to create and post the chart. I'm assuming that it is an Excel spreadsheet or
something similar. I'd ask for the advice now, but I'll forget the answer by next season. :)
|
|||
briand73 |
|||
McPhever224 wrote: We did get completely into her head in the finale though with the discussions of being at the bottom of every alliance. Strategy alone doesn't make
someone CP. In fact, strategy alone probably isn't enough for CP.
|
|||
chaperone |
|||
|
People keep their charts in Excel. If you copy the cells from Excel into Photosohp or Paint or something then save it as a JPG...post it...boom. Easy
cheesy nice and peesy.
|
|||
Katy Carney |
|||
AllMenAreIslands wrote: I agree. In the middle of her dry spell she still had game-related moments with Eliza and was shown strategizing in some of them. I felt like a lot of Parvati's ratings were skewed, especially the N's late game (when huge chunks of Cirie negativity were ignored, like "my entertainment is screwing with Natalie" from last week). However, I'm not exactly objective either, so... |
|||
scepticA |
|||
|
chaperone wrote:
Easy cheesy nice and peesy.I hope this puts to rest the notion that the level of discourse in edgic is not of the highest caliber. |
|||
OnlyTheHunter |
|||
|
sceptic wrote
I hope this puts to rest the notion that the level of discourse in edgic is not of the highest caliber. That's, like, so fuckin' deep, man. Michael Sorry, reading up with the conversations in spoilers right now is taining me! :-) |
|||
TheLurkerSpeaks |
|||
AllMenAreIslands wrote: Wrong! UTR doesn't mean "insignificant", it means "under-the-radar". A player can have a very significant moment without it
actually playing much direct role in the current events of the episode. Think of it this way. If an episode is a scene from a play, the CP's are the
protagonists for good or ill - we know their motivations. The OTT's are the foils and/or obstacles - they place the moral frame of reference. The
MOR's are role players - they are involved in the plot and move the story along, but the story isn't really about them. The UTR's are the bit
parts, who seem inconsequential to the plot, at least upon the surface, but even they can offer a line that holds greater significance to the work as a whole.
|
|||
cantthinkofaname |
|||
|
I don't know, I need to watch it again. If no one's doing a VF count I can do it, either later tonight or tomorrow.
Amanda - CPP4 Cirie - CPP3 Natalie - CP2 Parvati - CP4 |
|||
Warrior |
|||
cantthinkofaname wrote: That would be great cantthinkofaname. I am leaving tommorow morning, I'll be gone for 2 weeks. I will be able to check from time to time. Thanks. |
|||
briand73 |
|||
|
TLS, where do the INVs appear in your narrative? Should the INV rating be left only to those who aren't actually seen, or can someone be physically
visible yet still Edgically invisible? Is there a difference between "we don't want you to see everything the player is doing to keep them under the
radar" and "this person is insignificant"?
|
|||
Werwanderflugen |
|||
|
Hmm, my ratings seem to be a little different:
|
|||
Oowatanite |
|||
|
Don't get TLS started with INV please !
|
|||
scepticA |
|||
|
post 5K.
Wheeee! |
|||