Yuku free message boards

gretchensucks wrote:

---

The fact that it's falling means there is no final three (which we are led to believe). Supported because it's the final falling card...or last twist.

But I don't buy that BS. Still, that is one interpretation.

As posted in Spoilers by JHTMS:

Tonight's one-hour show begins at 8 p.m. on CBS, Channel 14 on Comcast and Channels 5 and 6 on Charter Communications. One more "Survivor" will be voted out.

Sunday's finale airs from 8-10 p.m, with the first hour in Micronesia, where two more castaways will be voted out. At 9 p.m., the jury's final votes will be tallied, and will decide which of the two finalists wins.

http://www.dailypressandargus.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080508/NEWS01/805080310/1002

AnneZob wrote:

Tinkering at the edges to try to find the perfect balance is common - outright fundamental changes to the basic fundamentals of the game is not.

Trixiego wrote:

So basically you are saying that changing it from a final two to a final three wasn't an outright fundamental change but changing it BACK is one.

AnneZob wrote:

I said uncommon, not never. How many times have they changed the composition of the final in 16 seasons of Survivor? Once. That is not common. Changing more minor things like starting number of players happens all the time. People keep on saying that "they keep on changing things in the game to keep players on their toes so why not from F3 back to F2" but the things they keep on changing all the time are more minor things, or tinkering at the edges. The composition of the final has only ever changed once in the entire history of survivor. It is obviously not a change they take lightly and it is not meant to keep players on their toes. Besides, if it is supposed to mean a switch from F3 to F2 why the medical theme of the clue?

People who think there's still a chance of the F2 coming back are more delusional than Clinton supporters who think she still has a chance short of the discovery of Obama's secret mormon family.

The switch in Cook Islands was not a twist. It was never advertised as one or referred to as one. It was a permanent change in the way they were running the games, much like the various tiebreaker changes over the years.