I think BBAU tries to cram in too much too soon and it always ends up just being unexciting and overwhelming. I don't think the public would have hated a
couple weeks to just get to know the initial housemates. They could have brought in Corey (with or without Terri) later if he is such a controversial figure.
The whole gatecrashers situation is strange, why let somebody in if you know they are just going to quit later. What if Terri had chosen to keep him?
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 Baulder |
|||
|
Posts: 289 (05/07/08 8:52 AM) Registered user |
|
||
|
ptcruisn56 |
|||
|
Posts: 4371 (05/07/08 10:09 AM) Registered user |
Yea I don't get the whole keep people in for two days and then let them go. Never understood why bring in Anita and Rachel in the first season just to have
one leave two days later. If you are bringing them in, keep them in.
|
||
 aaronin08 |
|||
|
Posts: 270 (05/07/08 11:58 AM) |
So by the sounds of it, Housemates will be evicting themselves this year - not just this week.
Dangerzone last night: Alice, David, Dixie, Rebecca & Saxon |
||
|
027huds |
|||
|
Posts: 327 (05/07/08 12:21 PM) Registered user |
Seriously, why the fuck has Rory not been in the danger zone yet? He's awful. Fair enough some people like Nobbi because of the drama he adds to the house,
but Rory doesn't do anything and is fucking horrible.
It looks like it may be Rebecca, Saxon and David up. I'd be happy with any of those leaving, although I hate Saxon the most. David is less of a dickhead than him and you could kill off Rebecca without anyone noticing. I'm gonna say Rebecca will go, because of the fucktard mafia. Everything could change though as the teeny whores are too stupid to think about their voting. Hopefully they will have all run out of money in a few weeks. |
||
|
Former Angel Gabriel |
|||
|
Posts: 4307 (05/07/08 12:49 PM) Registered user |
Hopefully they will have all run out of money in a few weeks.Unfortunately, the cunts have an endless supply of money. It has been funny watching them go crazy when Alice and Renee entered the danger zone... as if it means anything this early in the week. Obviously no one cares enough to save David, Rebecca, or Saxon so they will probably be the ones up and Rebecca will go. |
||
|
MikiBoi |
|||
|
Posts: 2135 (05/07/08 2:07 PM) Registered user |
So by the sounds of it, Housemates will be evicting themselves this year - not just this week. They said this from the premiere I believe. It's that way through the whole series.
Travis is really growing on me. If he is gae or not, I don't care. Let people be and be free. If he's gae and hiding it, so be it, he's a
cool kid. I love how he hugs the straight guys for so long and puts his head on their shoulders. |
||
|
aaronin08 |
|||
|
Posts: 272 (05/07/08 2:18 PM) |
No fucking nominations either!? That's just stupid..
Nominations were the best part of Big Brother 
|
||
|
ryanne35 |
|||
|
Posts: 573 (05/07/08 3:14 PM) Registered user |
Everything could change though as the teeny whores are too stupid to think about their voting. Hopefully they will have all run out of money in a few weeks.But can you really argue with the bottom lately?? Sure, Rory may be an asshole, but he's sort of entertaining. Teenies may suck most of the time, but I'm loving the bottoms so far. I couldn't care less whether or not any of the "in danger" housemates leave. Besides Bianca, I kind of like her. But I'm super delighted to see David in the bottom, I thought his body would get him enough teenie votes. Then again, his face is pretty wrecthed. Looks bad for Rebecca. She's most likely in the bottom 3 with 2 boys, which means the spa mafia will vote her out, and the girls will split the vote between the two boys (or even vote for her since she apparently tried to quit). |
||
|
ItsAlanisbitch |
|||
|
Posts: 40 (05/07/08 4:36 PM) |
Obvs that Travis is an oppressed homosexual. I mean... his most valuable possession was a bible! He was going to bring a bible in ffs, this isn't BBUS.
|
||
|
shiza h minelli |
|||
|
Posts: 327 (05/07/08 7:28 PM) |
ItsAlanisbitch wrote: yes... the oppressed homo in his short shorts pickin' cotton in the fields... oh lawdy
|
||
|
GodHatesAllOfUs |
|||
|
Posts: 1291 (05/07/08 7:51 PM) Registered user |
ItsAlanisbitch wrote:You meant repressed right? Although I can imagine he gets stick all the time from people. |
||
|
kennethp21 |
|||
|
Posts: 2960 (05/07/08 8:23 PM) Registered User |
aaronin08 wrote: no they weren't, entertaining people always up, and boring people just got further and further this new system will allow someone like Terry to survive long. IF terri had been on last season, she would have been evicted first.
|
||
|
El Hutch |
|||
|
Posts: 380 (05/07/08 9:10 PM) |
Terry is an asshole.
'I didn't see everybody clap' Cause you're a twit, ya annoying hag. They gotta let Nobbi in the house at some point, no? Put the old bag in the van. |
||
|
Former Angel Gabriel |
|||
|
Posts: 4308 (05/07/08 9:12 PM) Registered user |
The new voting system keeps the entertaining ones in longer, but prevents them from winning.
|
||
|
Cuauhtemoc Gilmore |
|||
|
Posts: 12260 (05/07/08 10:10 PM) |
I've only watched daily shows here and there but <3 David and <3 Renee.
|
||
|
MikiBoi |
|||
|
Posts: 2136 (05/07/08 10:41 PM) Registered user |
Former Angel Gabriel wrote: Exactly. The other system killed the entertaining ones earlier on but the 1 or 2 that survived had some sort of shot at winning. |
||
|
kennethp21 |
|||
|
Posts: 2962 (05/07/08 10:49 PM) Registered User |
MikiBoi wrote: yeah that 1 or 2 being the entertaining contestants jamie, logan, trevor, season 1 winner, season 2 winner,
|
||
|
MikiBoi |
|||
|
Posts: 2138 (05/07/08 11:12 PM) Registered user |
kennethp21 wrote: I said chance at winning. Not actual winners. Zach and Ves come to mind the most. Honourable mention goes to superbitch Camilla. Least with the old system, you still had someone to root for in the end, this system of voting might not provide that. |
||
|
aaronin08 |
|||
|
Posts: 273 (05/07/08 11:26 PM) |
I liked the fact that they had to nominate.. not so much the nominations or the process in which they did it.. but it was great to sometimes only have 3 people
up.. got rid of some of the more boring characters (not alot though)
Some people will survive longer than they could in this new process, but alot will survive longer than they should as well. Undoubtedly FNL will fuck with the process as well. Perhaps if you win, you'll be safe from the vote, and maybe even save a few of your friends too. |
||
|
MikiBoi |
|||
|
Posts: 2147 (05/07/08 11:40 PM) Registered user |
I think FNL wins will allow the winner to bring 2 people to strategize in terms of who to target for noms. I think that's the power this year. A Mini Hoh sort of thing. Should be interesting. Your noms thing still kinda happens cause apparently when they vote to evict, they do the 2 and 1 point system and I'm sure the process for noms will be the same for the eviction since it's the same point system. Kinda a noms show in a way. |
||
He delivers for awkward male on male moments.
- Survivor Suck-ups
- Lions, Tigers, Survivors - Oh My!
- Survivor Spoilers
- MESS Hall Tribal Council
- FOB
- Survivor Speculation
- Survivor 17+
- MESS Hall Archive: S2-S6
- MESS Hall Archive: S7-S9
- Spoiler Attic
- The Amazing Race
- Big Brother
- Big Brother - PAST SEASONS
- The Apprentice
- American Idol
- American Idol PAST SEASONS
- The Mole
- Lost
- Other Shows That Suck
- Off Topic
- Clubs That Suck. No, Really.
- The Dump
- Monster Island
- Purgatory
- FAQ
- In Memory, 9/11/01
