| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
survivorisdabest |
|||
|
Well i doubt they knew about ben's secret room where he could call the monster so i dont think they would freak out and shoot her the moment he stepped
away from the window. But what you said about him thinking he could save her is definately right. When i saw them shoot her I ZOMGed.
|
|||
Leeopold Stotch |
I | ||
|
In response to a comment someone made about not being able to fully understand Lost without spending a certain amount of time on the boards:
(First, let me take the opportunity to bow down before the awesomeness that is the collective fandom of you all - I feel like I'm the biggest Lost fan in the world, but then I come here [where I am an "active lurker"] and I am humbled. You guys fucking blow my mind.) I believe (one of) the great(est) things about this show, as with any great art (and I do consider Lost to be great art) is the layers and subtext, and the ability to truly enjoy this show with any level of understanding. I watch the show, and feel giddy and excited, like I just saw something fantastic, albeit somewhat confusing. The genius of this show lies in the willingness of the fans to accept this confusion as par for the course, and to continue watching and enjoying and being fully engaged in it, despite the haze. Then I come here, and read the theories and analysis, and I'm exposed to a whole new world of enjoyment and excitement, where certain things are made clear, and certain things are rendered that much more deliciously tantalizing. I feel that both "Lost Experiences" are equally fulfilling and satisfying, but exist on two very different planes, much like Lost itself. It's the difference between reading a great book for entertainment purposes - when you're finished, you feel like you experienced something wonderful, but might be hard pressed to expand on that - and studying and researching that book - you find so much more in the subtext that a casual reader would inevitably miss. One experience isn't superior to the other, but they are very, very different. |
|||
Riliss |
|||
|
That's a bad bear, Butters. A very bad bear indeed!
|
|||
Leeopold Stotch |
|||
|
Aw, hamburgers
|
|||
WiscBadger95 |
|||
survivorisdabest wrote: Yep. Ben assumed that they were operating under some set of rules that wouldn't allow Alex to be executed in cold blood. When he saw that that was no longer the case, he felt he was justified in ringing Smokey's dinner gong. |
|||
phantomkp |
|||
WiscBadger95 wrote: Heres my take.
Ben never even dared to go and do whatever he had to do to bring out old smokey...until Widmore "broke the rules" and had his daughter killed in cold blood. (we all know that Ben has a thing about murderers of innocents). And we all can see that calling forth smokey isnt the easiest thing in the world to do...Ben looked like he had to go through a bit to have it done, hopefully in a future episode we can see exactly where he went behind that door... And, we know from Ben that there are "good" people and "bad" people. Smokey reads people and kills "bad" people. Ben tells Locke hes "one of the good guys..." which is why Locke can face smokey and not die. Now im thinking smokey eating you is tied to the person killing innocents in cold blood. (innocents being people not involved in the game) If Michael ever ran into smokey...he'd be toast. When Ben was able to release smokey, it went directly for the guys with guns cause they killed a bunch of others and alex in particular, a no-no? (remember, alex is pretty much a female version of aaron, isnt she? I girl impregnated off the island and born on it..) Which also gets me to thinking, when Ben told Locke that in order to see Jacob and be chosen hed have to sacrifice his father for the island...was he trying to set him up for smokey to eat him? Surely if Locke killed the guy with his own hands, that would put him in the "bad" group, no? Locke was intuitive enough to get Sawyer to do it... And when that didnt work, Ben took the matter in his own hands and tried to kill Lock himself by shooting him...which throws my whole theory out the window cause wouldnt that be just as bad? lol shouldnt smokey be after Ben as well? Then again, maybe thats why ben was frantic when he came back, desperate to run away knowing that after smokey was done with the invaders, he might be next... |
|||
FeliciaM7 |
|||
Now im thinking smokey eating you is tied to the person killing innocents in cold blood. (innocents being people not involved in the game)Then why would smokey chase after Jack in the past? Jack has never killed anyone in cold blood. |
|||
Fluffynurse |
|||
|
Smokey almost had Locke down it's pie-hole too.
Did Ben necessarily get dirty activating Smokey? Maybe he got dirty going to another time off island to confront Widmore? Oh, welcome Leeopold! Glad to see you posting & not just lurking. |
|||
phantomkp |
|||
FeliciaM7 wrote: Couldnt you say smokey chased after Jack cause he was running away from it? lol, smokey just wanted to do a scan on jack like he did kate and juliet in that tree...smokey never would have killed jack though. |
|||
phantomkp |
|||
Fluffynurse wrote: And Locke wanted to go down the pie-hole! He knew, somehow, he wasnt going to die. Most likely he would have been rewarded of seeing a lair that
Ben had access too beyond that door.
|
|||
terpsy |
|||
|
|||
WiscBadger95 |
|||
|
I rewatched this episode last night and caught something I missed the first time around.
When Claire woke up and saw Christian holding Aaron, the first thing she said was "Dad?" Interestingly, she said it exactly the same way Locke said it when he saw his old man tied up in Ben's dungeon. |
|||
GodIsAnAtheist |
|||
WiscBadger95 wrote: Wrong episode, but interesting nonetheless.
|
|||
WiscBadger95 |
|||
|
Yep, I just realized that.
|
|||