1. Probst has been hyping all the blindsides which doesn't fit with the Cirie/Parvati/Amanda Final 3 agreement holding.
2. My gut, after watching 15 seasons of Survivor, is that Parvati wins, mainy because her confessional in the first episode where she says that her game will go beyond flirting could easily have been omitted.
3. Alexis has had some good Insider clips yet they have not made the actual show. I feel that the editors have done this because they don't want the viewers to think that she has any game.
4. If both Alexis and Natalie are Final 3, then there are only 2 fans on the jury.
So. my spec. is:
At Final 5, Parvati turns on Amanda/Cire in favor of Alexis/Natalie because she views Amanda and Cirie as her strongest competitors and she feels that she has a better chance of winning a jury vote against Alexis/Natalie. Amanda (physical threat) and Cirie (social and strategic threat) are voted out.
Parvati/Alexis/Natalie are Final 3
Parvati wins with at least Cirie/Amanda/Ozzy/James voting for her because even though she may have betrayed all of them, she is viewed as playing the game whereas Alexis/Natalie are viewed as pawns who did little to get as far as they did.


















