New Poll
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
LKMOSCAR |
|||
|
I'm going to do a Kathy: ''Where did AMANDA come from?''
|
|||
I LUV TIJUANA |
|||
|
LHAFM
Lydia H? A? Fish Monger Lydia wins Survivor Micronesia! |
|||
beatlebum79 |
|||
|
Do we even have to put meaning in that? How about this?
|
|||
ProbstFan123 |
|||
Anyway, I'm starting to think this is pointing to an Amanda win. There seem to be a few things that point to that:Again, this is where the editing comes in handy. If I had trusted it last season, I would have stuck by my initial Todd pick. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Amanda is not the winner. |
|||
Cassidy666 |
|||
|
Christ. This is ridiculous.
|
|||
ZombieLinda |
|||
beatlebum79 wrote: Alphabetical down the columns yw |
|||
WylDawg |
|||
I am totally at loss as to how you have determined the final 3 of Cirie/Alexis (or Amanda)/Parvati. Is it based on the "girls" alliance on episode of 3? There do not appear to be any real spoilers out here, just a little piece of info here and there. Is this spec or spoilers? X Parvati/Amanda/Cirie/Alexis in the endgame is all pure speculative bullshit, yet people have been stating it as fact for the past weeks. Go figure. |
|||
Jack Tourette |
|||
|
why the fuck do people assume because it says mid-jury-late game that all of a sudden for the first time in Survivor history, we have an all-female Final 3,
let alone Final 5. I would bet my life a male wins yet AGAIN. And that a few bits of this spoiler evidence is complete and utter bullshit.
|
|||
GrenadeJumper85 |
|||
|
^ The thing about that is that most of the guys are only labeled as "Makes Jury" or "Mid-Jury" while all the post-merge girls except for
Eliza, are labeled "Mid-jury to late game."
None of the guys have been spoiled as late gamers. |
|||
LKMOSCAR |
|||
Jack Tourette wrote: What happened to Jonathan being in the final 8? |
|||
SurvivorFanGP |
|||
|
A female is definitely going to win. Poor Ami couldn't be there to witness vagina power (until it fell apart) a second time around. |
|||
kenc333 |
|||
|
Are people leaving Amanda and Natalie out of the running because they've had little screentime and few (or no) confessionals?
|
|||
SurvivorFanGP |
|||
|
Basically. For all we know they can make F3, but so far they've done virtually nothing.
|
|||
A Bartholomew |
|||
LHAFM Look halfway at first message Probst wins |
|||
AmightyRo |
|||
A Bartholomew wrote: Look halfway at the FUCKING message. |
|||
ggdr |
Female Alliance | ||
|
Jack Tourette stated above this
would be the first all female F3... We actually had one in Marquesas -- lest we forget (and many people do) Vecepia, Nehlia and Kathy... That said, the
editing and pre-season spoilage is too specific and definitely points towards a decisive female alliance. They are definitely not flying under the radar and
for the first time we are actually seeing women on the show making decisive boot decisions. Cirie/Parvati/Amanda/Eliza are definitely making the boot
decisions on their tribe and are not being swayed by the male "leaders" and Alexis is shown in insider confessionals to be the true power player on
their tribe making alliances behind the scenes and appears to be the strategic narrator of the Fans tribe thus far. Aside from the Joel/Mikey backstab
situation, we really aren't seeing any strategic play or thought by the men -- they are only reactive; we are also seeing by editing and other comments
that the Joel/Mikey situation is basically a testosterone Alpha-male type scenario rather than gameplay -- which doesn't bode well for either of their
futures...
|
|||
Bizzmaker88 |
|||
|
Interesting new promo considering everyone's interpretations of the "spoilers" we have...
![]()
|
|||
ProbstFan123 |
|||
|
If a favorite wins, it will be Parvati. If a fan wins, it will be Alexis.
|
|||
SurvivorFanGP |
|||
|
Cirie could just be another Todd in terms of editing, though I don't even think Todd's edit was as over the top as her's seems to be. |
|||
mtj1282 |
|||
|
Amanda doesnt need a strong edit in the first few episodes to be the winner. The majority of fans probably saw last season and know she made it to the end. So
as long as her edit keeps getting better then if she makes it to the end it will be extremley easy for her to be made out to be a very deserving winner.
Getting to the end twice in a row and playing a "great" game is enough to be considered "deserving." What exactly is a great or a deserving
winner anyway though? No right or wrong way to play or to win!
|
|||