Yuku free message boards

Mypoody2 wrote:

---

First juror isn't early, unless they're going back to 9 jurors with a final 3, which would be a waste.

i don't see them getting rid of it, because people got tired of the goat in a final 3 situation. also after a lot of people weren't happy with the winner of allstars 1, and i don't see them getting rid of a final 3 for allstars vs newbies. i want the final 3 gone too, but i just don't see them getting rid of it for those reasons.

chad6 wrote:

---

sunflower100 wrote:

---

Mypoody2 wrote:

---

First juror isn't early, unless they're going back to 9 jurors with a final 3, which would be a waste.

i don't see them getting rid of it, because people got tired of the goat in a final 3 situation. also after a lot of people weren't happy with the winner of allstars 1, and i don't see them getting rid of a final 3 for allstars vs newbies. i want the final 3 gone too, but i just don't see them getting rid of it for those reasons.

I can't see them getting rid of a final 3, but they may make the jury smaller. I mean, it is really stupid when you have people deciding who should win when they haven't even met all the finalists.

i do think they should make the jury smaller, but sense we have a final 3 we are probably stuck with a larger jury. i wander if it is easier to house the jury or something along those lines from a production stand point that we have 9 jurors. do they think they are less likely to have less bitter jurors voting, if they start the jury sooner, or do they think it increases the chance for more interesting jury questions? it would increase the odds, because you hae more jurors, and thus more jury questions being asked.