In a time when we can't even get the world to agree that the Holocaust actually happened, we have been able to get a vast conspiracy to agree that man is wrecking the environment. That's no small feat, people, and you should not ignore it.
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
glazerboy |
|||
|
I, for one, am impressed that the world has finally been able to pull off a global conspiracy. To have so many people of so many different countries and races
and creeds all get together to conspire to promote the idea that humans are adversely affecting the world's climate is an achievement of monumental
proportions.
In a time when we can't even get the world to agree that the Holocaust actually happened, we have been able to get a vast conspiracy to agree that man is wrecking the environment. That's no small feat, people, and you should not ignore it. |
|||
merkyl |
|||
|
Nice try, glazer, but no. It's only a small handful of people, but they are speaking the loudest, therefor it seems a "consensus".
Now run back to your Michael Moore movie, I don't want you to miss anything. |
|||
BoeschFan |
|||
|
You need to study the history of the eugenics movement.* There are some
very, very frightening parallels.
* And not the half-assed, sanitized Wikipedia version. |
|||
glazerboy |
|||
|
Nice try merkyl but according to the UNFCCCC site concerning the Kyoto treaty:
As of 23 October 2007, 175 countries and 1 regional economic integration organization (the EEC) have deposited instruments of ratification, accession, approval or acceptance. 175 countries are in on the conspiracy. |
|||
someonestolemyfries |
|||
merkyl wrote: Merkyl has the hands of a giant. He's got the whole world in his hands! |
|||
BoeschFan |
|||
glazerboy wrote: Do you think most of those politicians even bothered to review the science before they took action? It's not a conspiracy. It's more like a confederacy of dunces. |
|||
PoChop |
|||
glazerboy wrote: Well in that case we should consider the problem to be more or less solved, even without the US. I'll wait for these 175 countries to reduce their global greenhouse gas generation by 25 to 40% below 1990 levels so they can shame the US and China into following suit. BTW, I heard a number that the GHG generation due to travel to the Bali conference is equivalent to what about 22,000 cars generate in a year. (Might have been more cars, can't remember right now.) |
|||
merkyl |
|||
|
Glad glazer did finally admit it's more political than scientific.
|
|||
Strange Flute |
|||
|
The president of the Czech Republic doesn't believe in global warming. He's a free market economist with no science background. Yes, it's the President of the Czech Republic:
Last Edited By: Strange Flute
12/14/07 4:57 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
BoeschFan |
|||
|
And Bjorn Lomborg is a Danish economist who
believes humans are causing global climate change. But he also argues that the "cures" proposed by the IPCC and others are a colossal waste of
resources that could be used much more efficiently to make great strides against AIDS, malaria and other ills of the human race. Basically, Lomborg's
argument goes that if we were to follow the prescription being laid out, we would expend vast amounts of capital and resources, but see little to no real
gains.
So, what kind of half-assed point are you trying to make, Strange Fucktard?
Last Edited By: BoeschFan
12/14/07 5:04 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
Angela in WI |
|||
|
Filthy floor-sleepin' hoor.
|
|||
Proniz |
|||
|
Dinosaurs are NOT the source of oil. It's actually ancient sea plankton.
|
|||
AllMenAreIslands |
|||
BoeschFan wrote: Can we blame it on George W. Bush? Because he's the leader of the Free World, and all.
|
|||
BoeschFan |
|||
Proniz wrote: The globe may warm enough that humans may go extinct (and I think it would be rather apropos that we would go extinct by our own hand), but more likely we will adapt - like we have been doing for thousands of years. However, to believe that we will warm the planet enough to wipe out all life is arrogant and egocentric to the extreme. If you look at the planet's history on a geological scale, it has gone through very long periods (from both a geological as well as human perspective) when it was much, much warmer than what even the greatest alarmists are predicting will happen with the current global warming. And during those periods life not only survived, it thrived. |
|||
Strange Flute |
|||
As far as global warming goes it is a religion. Religion is there for man to feel good about himself, despite what science says. If global warming is a "religion", which is debatable, wouldn't it be better to believe in it than not? If you believe in God, you have a better chance of going to heaven. If you believe in global warming, you have a better chance of preventing disaster. |
|||
Proniz |
|||
|
That's hilarious. A "disaster" to who? THAT is the egocentric religion of global warming. We MUST (halleluhah!!!) save ourselves!! AMEN
Brother!!
Puleaze... I'm in line with BF's thinking - life will continue in some form in some way. Life is very adaptable. The religion is thinking that man is so important that we must do "something" to "save" the planet. :rollyeyes |
|||
BoeschFan |
|||
Proniz wrote: It's not so much my thinking as it is the whole damned discipline of geology and natural history. Learn it. Live it. Love it. |
|||
Strange Flute |
|||
|
How do we know God isn't making the sun hotter to punish us for secular lesbians? And if we burn secular lesbians, aren't we contributing to global
warming?
|
|||
merkyl |
|||
merkyl wrote: Posted again for yahoo.
|
|||
sealbach |
|||
|
can we start with burning you and your idiotic posts?
|
|||