I'll be rooting for the Wiccan.
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Lovejonze |
|||
|
I think everyone in the house should be an athiest. I'm worried that the next cast will be representing every religion, plus a Satanist, a Wiccan, an
athiest and an agnostic.
I'll be rooting for the Wiccan. |
|||
nomii |
|||
|
Camera feed 4 = always keep on the DR and the questions asked plz.
Twists are fine by me i guess, since the chances of 14 strangers turning out to be duds is the same as people who loosely know each other. Nooooooo food restrictions and more alcohol!!!!!! Hard liquour come on. MAKE BB MORE TORTUROUS - the house smaller, random tasks given to houseguests involving betrayal / paranoia. |
|||
Lovejonze |
|||
|
Bring back PBJ, the margarita bar, rewards and the sadistic mindfucks from BB1.
|
|||
Quiddity |
|||
zesty fuzz wrote: George and Jen both had to do a hell of a lot more than that. Jen gave up half her winnings, and had shit poured over her for 24 hours. George shaved his
head, burned all his clothes, gave up the right to play in a future veto, and went on slop for the rest of the summer.
|
|||
PleasantMama |
|||
|
Please remove the AP. I know it gives you a god-like control over the game, but that sucks As a compromise, you may allow America to just have an extra vote
that you can rig to your heart's content, maybe also allow a vote for who America would nom, tell the HoH each week with a $$$ offer for each of the two
they nominate. It'd be highly preferable to seeing another person struggle through the self interest/AP role again.
|
|||
Kirblar |
|||
Quiddity wrote: The problem wasn't the lack of personalities, it was a complete lack of likable human beings.
|
|||
Bobby Mc in C Town |
|||
|
Three words - Celebrity Big Brother
Come on. You know you wanna see Vanilla Ice cut off from society for three months... |
|||
Will |
|||
|
Stop casting people like Sea Hag and Jen.
|
|||
actor35 |
|||
Bobby Mc in C Town wrote: I'm sorry but I just don't see how this could ever possibly work. If a celeb has a life, then they won't be willing to lock themselves up in some horrible house for 3 or 4 months. On the other hand, if they don't have a life, they sure can't be much of a celeb, now can they? How could this ever work? You'd have to set the prize money at many millions of Euros (the US Dollar is not worth shit anymore) and you'd have to scrap the notion of playing for charity. No one who earns celebrity money will give up three months of earnings just to give the winnings to a charity. It just can't make any sense. P.S. Before you get on my ass about the US dollar, when the Euro first came out, it was set equal to the US Dollar. One Euro = One US Dollar. Today the dollar is worth only 60 Euro cents. It's lost 40% of its value and it's just started to crash. Figure in two more months, it should slide another 30% and the dollar will only be worth about 30 Euro cents. If you want to protect your money, it's a very complex and involved situation. Best consult a financial planner. By the way, that is one funny fact about the grand prize. If a Donato does win the $500K, they will be in for a very rude awakening. Anything they buy that was imported (like gasoline) is gonna cost a fortune. Oil is now $80 a barrel and never been so high. It's going higher all the time. All the problems with mortgages are related to this. Dani thinks maybe she will buy a house with the winnings? Hah! She can think again.
Last Edited By: actor35
09/12/07 6:37 PM.
Edited 4 times.
|
|||
sakya23 |
|||
|
14 complete strangers
12 weeks not 10. Two Double Evictions, where three people are on the block Don't tolerate rule breakers and hand out some Punishments Have two or three intruders in week 3 or week 4 to shake things up. Have a live launch show Have audiences Get rid of Julie Chen Have a separate arena to have more complex competitions. |
|||
actor35 |
|||
sakya23 wrote: Truly excellent suggestions. I hope they offer you a job! |
|||
Dcg797750 |
|||
|
14 complete strangers - Yes
12 weeks not 10. - Yes Two Double Evictions, where three people are on the block - YES! Don't tolerate rule breakers and hand out some Punishments - Yes Have two or three intruders in week 3 or week 4 to shake things up. - Yes Have a live launch show - Yes Have audiences - Live shows only. Get rid of Julie Chen - Who would they put on, Anderson Cooper? He was the host for the Mole, i think. Have a separate arena to have more complex competitions. - Yes, but Question challenges, it's not really needed. |
|||
Kirblar |
|||
sakya23 wrote: Turning BB USA into BB UK = Lose.
|
|||
SimplyKimberly |
|||
|
Dear Aly G,
I want to see the following in BB next year: 1. no models 2. no actors 3. real people from all walks of life 4. no twists 5. all strangers 6. no power of veto competitions - end it 7. HOH competitions that don't break down 8. no America's choice/player/votes - America can't handle the responsibility 9. no more blackouts on the feeds - we pay for them, we should get to see everything 10. no former HGs in that house for any reason AND MOST IMPORTANTLY no delusional self important twats that believe in "good people" winning the game - they suck and screw up the real gameplay (see Jameka, Amber and the Nerd Herd for an example of this type of non-player) Thanks ever so much. |
|||
alposnacks |
|||
Lovejonze wrote:Do you remember BB5 where everybody in that fucking house was a Christian? It got really annoying after a while. |
|||
mocha frappuccino |
|||
|
How bout replacing ERIKUNT with the Flavor-Of-Love Casting Director so we can get ppl like Hottie/New York/Buckwild/Sumthin/Goldie & like their white
versions... I would pay double for live feeds to watch trash like that 24/7 HAHAHA
Oh and get that guy Chris Crocker on the show (If u dunno who that is just youtube that name & watch his videos) |
|||
SC8583 |
|||
|
Having watched all the seasons except for All-Stars (because I ended up hating too many of them by the end of their original seasons), I think the casting was
actually pretty good this season. The only real duds were Mike and Carol IMO, and luckily they were out in the first 3 weeks. The only thing was I absolutely
hated Eric and he seriously tainted the season for me, especially when he sucked all the fun and appeal out of Jessica.
I think nominating 3 people and having 1 go (sometimes 2 in the case of double evictions) would be good because it gets more people angry at each other and so much happens between the noms and evictions that the boots might be more unexpected by the time eviction night rolls around, and with 3 people to vote for there might be more of a chance of ties that the HOH would have to break. I disagree that they should do away with POV, but I do think that everybody should be able to compete so everyone has a fair chance to protect themselves or their allies, plus this will make people play harder for it. I agree that they should try using all strangers again. And have at least 2 black people and maybe one other minority. Between Nick, Zach and Mike they should have replaced one of them with a black or other minority man IMO. I think the key is to just cast people with strong or extreme personalities, tendencies and/or beliefs, along with really competitive people that at the same time aren't boring. This is why Dick, Daniele, Kail, Jen, Joe, Jameka, and Amber were good casting choices. Dustin was kind of blah but necessary as the pair with Joe, Zack was forgettable at first, but he has the nerdy/awkward thing going, Nick wasn't too into the gameplay but he was eyecandy and had his Minnesota charm, Jessica was upbeat and likeable until she got involved with Eric, and as I already stated Mike and Carol were terrible choices. Eric I just hated. Oh and maybe they should be isolated (or isolated in 2 random groups) the day of the eviction so they can't pre-vote conspire as easily. |
|||
EricSuxxx BigTime |
|||
|
^ NO TWISTS!!!
^ Everbody plays for veto~~~everytime. ^ The slop is played out......get rid of it. Bread & water would work with multi-vitamins. ^ Involve Kaysar more somehow - he personifies the gameeven though he never won. ^ Lay off the religeous undertones................................that belongs somewhere else. |
|||
Quiddity |
|||
|
I'm not as big a BB historian as some others here, but wasn't the veto originally with everyone playing, and that resulted in it being used only once
or twice the entire season? If you want it to be everyone again prepare to have it be used barely ever, and you lose your right to complain about it.
I like the idea of the 3 noms. The only major change would be that they may want to have the nominees vote, since their vote wouldn't be automatically for the other person like it is now (making it pointless for them to even cast a vote). It should result in more turmoil in the house and an overall more entertaining atmosphere. |
|||
managerr |
|||
I'm not as big a BB historian as some others here, but wasn't the veto originally with everyone playing, and that resulted in it being used only once or twice the entire season? If you want it to be everyone again prepare to have it be used barely ever, and you lose your right to complain about it. Yeah, I think it was first introduced in BB3 and hardly anyone ever used it. (Even Marcellas--hahaha!) Basically the veto episodes was worthless because some non-player would win it and it would go unused and cause no drama whatsoever. |
|||