| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Zonker |
|||
|
I always thought that they should throw a twist in there that the person who survives evicvtion each week should automatically become the new HoH. But, then
again, that could cause perpetial eviction of the previous HoH, just due to the revenge factor. But, I agree that they need to shake it up
next season and try something different.
|
|||
VolumeOn |
|||
|
The producers could use a different formula a few times within a season, i.e., the HG that wins POV could name the replacement nominee. The problem with this would be that it takes away from the HOH power. |
|||
ImSuperAwesome |
|||
|
I think they just need to start using the twist they mentioned a year ago (or two?) that every few competitions the Veto may not be won. Such as all six
players have a chance to win but if no one completes the competition then no veto is won.
|
|||
WylDawg |
|||
Zonker wrote: That pretty much sums up BB6. |
|||
Zonker |
|||
WylDawg wrote: I thought BB6 was one of the best. |
|||
Tam |
|||
|
I agree with the idea of immediate action POVs. There should also be a backdooring limit. The affect would be two fold; collectively, those not up for
elimination would have to declare their alliances a bit more clearly.(in order to claim a backdoor pass and there should also be an occasional 'exchange
places' (like in the game Trouble). Where one person on the block picks a card and exchanges places with the person ( or persons )using the backdoor pass.
It would require much more thought in using the backdoor pass. The possibility for genuine sacrifice would be attached to the backdoor manoeuver.
Something,anything to bring some life back to this 'summer treat'.uhuh |
|||
WylDawg |
|||
It was. For me at least. |
|||
Jesus of Najareth |
|||
|
Also if there was no veto, people like Jase and Jen would just be put up right away since they couldn't save themselves. It's actually harder to get
rid of someone through backdooring than it is to get rid of them with no veto in play.
|
|||
xtrememode |
|||
|
I have the solution that would end all backdoors. Allow the HoH and nominees to pick whoever they want to play for them. Anyone that doesn't play POV
should get immunity for the week. This would change the whole dynamics of the game. If you play POV, you have a chance to save a person on the block but you
are also risking yourself to be put up as a replacement. HoH can only nominate a replacement out of the 3 that are picked to play. This will get rid of people
throwing POV also. If the HoH plans on backdooring someone, they must choose them to play POV for them to be eligible to be put on the block.
Last Edited By: xtrememode
08/18/07 3:44 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
kmill |
|||
xtrememode wrote: I like it. |
|||
DeanerBigBro |
|||
WylDawg wrote:
|
|||
jane1958 |
|||
|
Great twist xtrememode good thinking.
|
|||
Who Would Jesus Bomb |
|||
xtrememode wrote: I think either the first season of the veto or the first couple of seasons they did pick their own players. I would rather than the HOH pick the
replacement, the veto winner gets to pick.
|
|||
maxxfisher |
|||
|
They should have Veto competitions where it is possible that no one can win it. Maybe like the timmed compitions, if the HGs don't finish in a certain time
then no one wins, if more than one finish in the alotted time then the person with the best time wins. It would fuck up people's games.
ETA: just wanted to say I put this up without reading ImSuperAwesome's post
Last Edited By: maxxfisher
08/18/07 7:57 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
Mateui |
|||
|
Why can't they just let everyone play veto? Of course, one person would have to be the host of the veto competition, and that person could be chosen by the
HOH. Being the host means that you don't get to play, but it would also mean that you couldn't be nominated - so in effect, the HOH would be giving the
veto host guaranteed immunity for the rest of the week.
This would eliminate backdooring, but would probably reduce the number of times the veto would be used.. which is why they went to the reduced player format in the first place.
Last Edited By: Mateui
08/18/07 8:06 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
Jesus of Najareth |
|||
|
I like how people are damning the veto now that it's hurting Jen, even though it was her savior for 3 weeks. She would have been a distant memory if it
wasn't in effect.
|
|||
highwind44029 |
|||
Honestly the veto should be removed from the F4.If they let that happen, they should allow the HOH during F5 to compete in the F4 HOH competition, because that person would not get the chance to save him/herself from eviction then. |
|||
mikeonfilm |
|||
|
The original reason for only six people playing for the veto was so that there was more of a likelihood one of the nominees would win it and therefore use it.
The veto originally was hardly ever used because people wanted to "respect the HoH" or didn't want to piss off whoever the replacement nom was.
Now this season the veto is getting used up like meth whore. It's really ridiculous. I like xtrememode's veto solution in general but I think you'd have to look more at how that would work. If the only people who can be replacement noms are the one's who play for veto then a) everyone would be telling the HoH and noms "Don't pick me!" or b) whoever you did pick would probably resent it and wonder if you were targetting them so they would try to win it to protect themselves and probably not use it anyway. Especially since there would only be two other people the HoH could nom. Using the veto in that case would definitely make you enemies. So we'd be right back to the veto hardly ever getting used. I think letting everyone compete for veto could work so long as EVERY veto comp was one where you had to sacrifice stuff. None of these trivia questions or croquet games. They should all be about how much the HG wants to win the veto. Endurance, punishments and sacrifices. That will quickly get the people out of the Veto comp who don't want to win it anyway. |
|||
maxxfisher |
|||
Jesus of Najareth wrote: I don't give a shit about Jen. I just want some things shook up. Too many times the HG's know exactly what is going to happen week to week and half the time they know what kind challenge it's going to be. Maybe once have 2 Vetos up for grabs, that would completely fuck up the HOH noms. Just, you know, throw some fucking variety in there. |
|||
hatebrigade |
|||
They should have Veto competitions where it is possible that no one can win it. Maybe like the timmed compitions, if the HGs don't finish in a certain time then no one wins, if more than one finish in the alotted time then the person with the best time wins. It would fuck up people's games.Wasn't there already a veto this season where it may not be won? |
|||