Search this Topic:
03/11/17 02:05 PM
03/11/17 03:03 PM
SkyDreamer wrote:Whoever ended up with Boston Rob in season 22. I honestly forgot. Think it was Ashley and Phillip?
03/12/17 08:12 AM
03/12/17 10:21 AM
03/12/17 05:30 PM
Zanief wrote:mick? is that his name? Survivor Samoa.
03/13/17 09:35 PM
03/14/17 12:31 AM
marshal99 wrote:Over the years , too many irelevant finalists. People can say natalie from S22 , she won immunity challenge once which is better than the likes of becky from cook islands or katie from palau.
03/15/17 05:27 PM
03/16/17 04:46 PM
05/18/17 10:37 PM
05/18/17 10:39 PM
05/19/17 11:24 AM
05/19/17 01:24 PM
05/19/17 03:15 PM
Escameca wrote:Definitely Becky, more than once I've had to double check whether it was her or Sundra who lost the fire challenge.
05/19/17 03:24 PM
05/19/17 04:08 PM
05/20/17 08:37 AM
DevilsAdvocaat wrote:yateswile wrote:Who would be your pick for the most irrelevant Survivor finalist ever. This doesnt just mean biggest goat, although that could be part of it. Just all around the most worthless and meaningless contestant in every conceivable way. So that shouldnt be someone who impacted the game in their own way (Russell, Sugar), were unique characters, people with an actual story arc, and so on.
Mick hasn't enraged you for five years, so to you he is literally a more irrelevant finalist than Natalie
Natalie is probably more visually attractive to people who find women attractive than Mick is to people who find men attractive.
Natalie inspires more hate.
Natalie has dozens of current, threads open about her.
They both won one IIC. They both received 0 votes. There have been many others like Mick. There are fewer others like Natalie.
New Survivor players are sometimes considered the "new Nat T".
No new Survivor players are ever considered the new Mick
You don't seem to have thought this through. I'm sorry, but at least you got the correct answer to your question.
yateswile wrote:Who would be your pick for the most irrelevant Survivor finalist ever. This doesnt just mean biggest goat, although that could be part of it. Just all around the most worthless and meaningless contestant in every conceivable way. So that shouldnt be someone who impacted the game in their own way (Russell, Sugar), were unique characters, people with an actual story arc, and so on.
05/20/17 08:38 AM
darkvader wrote:Mick had several final 3s he could win out of the Final 7 contestants alone- Jaison, Shambo, Fincher, probably doesnt beat Russell although Dave Ball told me once in person Mick would have beaten Russell so maybe wrong even there. Natalie clearly and beyond any dispute had no finals she had any chance of winning.
Mick wasnt a bad player at all, just too submissive to Russell. Natalie has no skills.
05/20/17 08:39 AM
Soniroku wrote:Sherri is up there. She had a strong pre-merge game, but couldn't make that into a case at FTC because quite frankly, she and all the fans were irrelevent in Caramoan. And as for her FTC performance...?
05/20/17 08:42 AM
Share This Link
Message board courtesy of Survivor Sucks member support.
Benevolent dictatorship courtesy of Survivor Sucks Admin Idoits.
© 2017 Yuku. All rights reserved.