So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/topic/51632/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html en-us Copyright 2006, Yuku feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster) webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster) Sun, 17 May 2009 21:11:48 GMT Sun, 24 May 2009 21:00:17 GMT Yuku Feeds 1.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Yuku http://static.yuku.com//feed/bypass/images/button-yuku.png http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/topic/51632/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html Yuku - free hosted forums and profiles 88 31 {pics-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 )) Search Search Domain q http://yuku.com/search/direct/ <![CDATA[ Re: So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? ]]> http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/reply/4462442/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html#reply-4462442 The Purple Parrot wrote:
I didn't know that "plotting" was considered a real strategy. If that's the case, Merhag plotted just as much and was seen as a waaaaaaaay stronger player than Erinn by the others. I liked Erinn, I liked her a lot, but the fact is she was not playing to win. In fact, Tocantins has to be the absolute worst season ever for strategy.
... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Mikester) http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/sreply/4462442 Sun, 24 May 2009 21:00:17 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? ]]> http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/reply/4462411/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html#reply-4462411 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (The Purple Parrot) http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/sreply/4462411 Sun, 24 May 2009 20:53:47 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? ]]> http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/reply/4462217/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html#reply-4462217 Katy Carney wrote:
WylDawg wrote:
Danni's situational was just as hopeless, perhaps even more and she pulled it out.


What a horrible comparison for your case. Danni only got the finals by winning the F3 challenge, otherwise she would have been third against an unbreakable pair just like Erinn. Aye.
... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (The Very Insane Shark) http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/sreply/4462217 Sun, 24 May 2009 19:44:24 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? ]]> http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/reply/4457537/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html#reply-4457537 Quiddity wrote:
OrsNaz wrote:
Sierra or Erinn didn't have much to work with this season. Everyone was too unpredictable and illogical on the Timbira tribe. What they did worked best for them.
Fixed. Sierra definately could have made things better for herself by realizing at F7 that 4 > 3. Instead she ruined any change of... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (OrsNaz) http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/sreply/4457537 Sat, 23 May 2009 11:53:18 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? ]]> http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/reply/4457526/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html#reply-4457526
Stephen is a female and JT is clearly a butch.
]]> feeds@yuku.com (JLK Name) http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/sreply/4457526 Sat, 23 May 2009 11:49:12 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? ]]> http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/reply/4455322/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html#reply-4455322
I don't care what anybody says, Erinn did NOT play hard enough. Her strategy was "well, I'll get to the final 4 and then take it from there." That essentially put her in fourth place and she got lucky that JT and Stephen were more afraid of Taj winning than Erinn and gave her third. She could have done more to switch back and forth between... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (chapera rocks) http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/sreply/4455322 Fri, 22 May 2009 16:22:28 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? ]]> http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/reply/4455157/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html#reply-4455157 Her strategy was "well, I'll get to the final 4 and then take it from there." That essentially put her in fourth place and she got lucky that JT and Stephen were more afraid of Taj winning
No, she was planting seeds that Taj was a popularity threat since early postmerge, and had a F2 deal with Stephen that he intended to keep (unlike his deals with JT and Taj).

Erinn badly outplayed all the other women in the game (not to mention the... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (craig) http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/sreply/4455157 Fri, 22 May 2009 15:19:49 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? ]]> http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/reply/4455127/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html#reply-4455127 paques wrote:

From my perspective, Parvati was the only aggressive / in total control female winner in the history of Survivor, and she needed a second season to accomplished that. Being aggresive and taking control is the only way that a female can be respected as a good schemer, but she also needs to face another woman at the end.



What about Tina? ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Dr Will Hatch two point oh) http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/sreply/4455127 Fri, 22 May 2009 15:09:43 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? ]]> http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/reply/4455087/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html#reply-4455087 WylDawg wrote:
Danni's situational was just as hopeless, perhaps even more and she pulled it out.


What a horrible comparison for your case. Danni only got the finals by winning the F3 challenge, otherwise she would have been third against an unbreakable pair just like Erinn. ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Katy Carney) http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/sreply/4455087 Fri, 22 May 2009 14:52:51 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? ]]> http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/reply/4455085/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html#reply-4455085 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (LKMOSCAR) http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/sreply/4455085 Fri, 22 May 2009 14:52:45 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? ]]> http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/reply/4454996/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html#reply-4454996 The Purple Parrot wrote:
I don't care what anybody says, Erinn did NOT play hard enough. Her strategy was "well, I'll get to the final 4 and then take it from there." That essentially put her in fourth place and she got lucky that JT and Stephen were more afraid of Taj winning than Erinn and gave her third. She could have done more to switch back and forth between alliances but she didn't.
... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (WylDawg) http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/sreply/4454996 Fri, 22 May 2009 14:22:45 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? ]]> http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/reply/4454963/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html#reply-4454963 From my perspective, Parvati was the only aggressive / in total control female winner in the history of Survivor, and she needed a second season to accomplished that. Being aggresive and taking control is the only way that a female can be respected as a good schemer, but she also needs to face another woman at the end.

]]> feeds@yuku.com (paques) http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/sreply/4454963 Fri, 22 May 2009 14:08:12 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? ]]> http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/reply/4454182/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html#reply-4454182
Less Sugar's, Sydney's, Mary's, Kelly's, more Tina, Cirie, Teresa, Tracy, Ami, Eliza etc., type female players.
]]> feeds@yuku.com (GrenadeJumper85) http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/sreply/4454182 Fri, 22 May 2009 10:17:17 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? ]]> http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/reply/4452625/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html#reply-4452625 The Purple Parrot wrote:
I don't care what anybody says, Erinn did NOT play hard enough. Her strategy was "well, I'll get to the final 4 and then take it from there." That essentially put her in fourth place and she got lucky that JT and Stephen were more afraid of Taj winning than Erinn and gave her third. She could have done more to switch back and forth between alliances but she didn't.
... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (SurvivorNinja) http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/sreply/4452625 Thu, 21 May 2009 21:25:35 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? ]]> http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/reply/4452530/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html#reply-4452530 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (The Purple Parrot) http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/sreply/4452530 Thu, 21 May 2009 21:01:21 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? ]]> http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/reply/4452485/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html#reply-4452485 Katy Carney wrote:
She didn't throw it away, she made a choice that would have benefitted her 9 times out of 10. It was only a dumb move in retrospect, because at the time she was putting the nail in the coffin of the player she feared the most: Yul.

9 times out of 10 is a bit too much credit. She most definately would have been safe until the merge where she could stick with Aitu or flip to the other... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (SurvivorNinja) http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/sreply/4452485 Thu, 21 May 2009 20:51:20 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? ]]> http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/reply/4452341/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html#reply-4452341 feeds@yuku.com (Katy Carney) http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/sreply/4452341 Thu, 21 May 2009 20:13:00 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? ]]> http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/reply/4452323/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html#reply-4452323 OrsNaz wrote:
Sierra or Erinn didn't have much to work with this season. Everyone was too unpredictable and illogical on the Timbira tribe. What they did worked best for them. Fixed. Sierra definately could have made things better for herself by realizing at F7 that 4 > 3. Instead she ruined any change of the Timbira's teaming up and finished 7th. Erinn to her credit worked very hard, and... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Quiddity) http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/sreply/4452323 Thu, 21 May 2009 20:07:58 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? ]]> http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/reply/4451814/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html#reply-4451814 WylDawg wrote:
How the hell was Erinn proactive? She switched to end up 3rd instead of 6th image


Being proactive usually means you're aiming at to be first, and will do all actions necessary to do so.
Working with Stephen, planting seeds of doubt regarding Taj, and actively trying (and making a good... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (chapera rocks) http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/sreply/4451814 Thu, 21 May 2009 17:33:01 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? ]]> http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/reply/4451652/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html#reply-4451652 WylDawg wrote:
How the hell was Erinn proactive? She switched to end up 3rd instead of 6th image


Being proactive usually means you're aiming at to be first, and will do all actions necessary to do so.
That's how it ended up, not what she played for. She switched to end up on the bottom of a four person... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Mikester) http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/sreply/4451652 Thu, 21 May 2009 16:47:42 GMT <![CDATA[ So, females should always make all girl alliances going forward? ]]> http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/topic/51632/t/-females---make--girl-alliances-going-forward-.html
RIGHT?!?!

]]> feeds@yuku.com (The Marquesan Godfather) http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/topic/51632 Sun, 17 May 2009 21:11:48 GMT