Question about Kate's trial...

Re: Question about Kate's trial...

feeds@yuku.com (CoconutPhone) — Sun, 02 Mar 2008 19:51:17 GMT

Blah blah blah. Do you think, REALLY think they're going to have multiple trials for this character on TV? GMAB. The only important thing story-wise is for her to get through to her mom and get her not to testify. The other charges don't matter for this to be accomplished. You want realism stick to Court TV.

Re: Question about Kate's trial...

feeds@yuku.com (cindidindi76) — Sun, 02 Mar 2008 14:37:04 GMT

What innocent man did she kill? I'm drawing a blank. Or did you mean Tom, since it's her fault he died?

Re: Question about Kate's trial...

feeds@yuku.com (CKS) — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 07:58:59 GMT

That trial was full of it, at first I was pissed, then I just accepted it as TV and Kate was going to have to get off to advance the storyline.

All her charges were not Federal so it makes no sense that they all would be tried in a federal court. Even if you took out the whole murder/arson case away, Kate still had at least a half dozen felonies & probably more misdemeanors. She had trying to ram her car into a road block, killing an innocent man, assault on police officers,...

Re: Question about Kate's trial...

feeds@yuku.com (CC1018) — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:42:20 GMT

I was also a little tiffed about the license they took w/ the trial episode :: there's no way they finished opening arguments & then they the defense call in Jack. As soon as they finished their openings, Kate's mom would have been rolled up as the 1st witness for the prosecution.

But then we would have never heard the 'tale'....

Re: Question about Kate's trial...

feeds@yuku.com (pussycow) — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:24:34 GMT

If this were Law and Order, McCoy would have Kate strapped to old sparky by now

Re: Question about Kate's trial...

feeds@yuku.com (cindidindi76) — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:45:24 GMT

I'm with you on that. This isn't Law and Order, no reason for them to show us the whole trial.

Re: Question about Kate's trial...

feeds@yuku.com (aslanscubs) — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:33:33 GMT

BTW, I'm pretty sure I heard Kate's lawyer say "Don't fire me, ok?" and then he said something about not doing well in the opening. THEN he brought out Jack as the witness. I say this because people were saying that the defense doesn't go first. Well, maybe we just didn't see that part. It's possible, right?

Re: Question about Kate's trial...

feeds@yuku.com (cindidindi76) — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:41:06 GMT

Well, that makes sense. Good thing we have someone so familiar with federal law!

Re: Question about Kate's trial...

feeds@yuku.com (Sardonically Irreverent) — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:50:43 GMT

If I understand federal law correctly, it states that if you wear that much makeup, you are by law required to face trial in California.

Re: Question about Kate's trial...

feeds@yuku.com (Bad Boyfriend) — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:10:08 GMT

Uhh, because Super Jack has better things to do than to than visit Incestville, Iowa?

Re: Question about Kate's trial...

feeds@yuku.com (terpsy) — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:26:52 GMT

and now she has to stay in the state- she will have to break probation when she goes back to the isle....we know she will

Re: Question about Kate's trial...

feeds@yuku.com (cindidindi76) — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:55:55 GMT

Maybe that was for the federal charges?

Question about Kate's trial...

feeds@yuku.com (catspasms) — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:31:41 GMT

...can somebody explain to me why she was tried in California when she blew up a house in Iowa?

Just wondering.