Survivor:Samoa Ratings

Re: Survivor:Samoa Ratings

feeds@yuku.com (Riliss) — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:57:12 GMT

wtf is the vampire diaries? is that code for dictatorship's underground blood (read: cock) sucking videos?

Re: Survivor:Samoa Ratings

feeds@yuku.com (Mypoody2) — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:37:54 GMT

lolololol @ vampire diaries... what a fruitcake.

Re: Survivor:Samoa Ratings

feeds@yuku.com (Olmec Donald) — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:31:56 GMT

If you like it so much, go watch that and stop watching Survivor. Maybe then you'll finally stop posting.

We got 3.7/10 in 18-49. I was hoping for an improvement on last week, but treading water is fine, especially since FlashForward is dropping like a stone in the ratings.

Re: Survivor:Samoa Ratings

feeds@yuku.com (Dictatorship) — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:01:47 GMT

The Vampire Diaries is 10 gajillion times better than this shitfest. I'm ashamed that America is so deluded right now.

Re: Survivor:Samoa Ratings

feeds@yuku.com (BlakeB717) — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:13:48 GMT

Nearly 5 million more than the competition. Great to see that the show is going strong. Based on this episode and next week's preview (tempting that the Evil One could go down), expect numbers to stay up.

Re: Survivor:Samoa Ratings

feeds@yuku.com (JT4ever) — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:58:03 GMT

Probst may be "bored," but with numbers like that I have no doubt CBS will help Burnett try to find the right price to get him to stay.

Re: Survivor:Samoa Ratings

feeds@yuku.com (Psprecinctprez) — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:38:34 GMT

Numbers are in and it looks like 12.7 million is the number to stay...

8 p.m.

CBS: "Survivor: Samoa" (12.7 million viewers, 7.5/12 households)
ABC: "FlashForward" (8.47 million, 5.5/9)
FOX: "Bones" (8.46 million, 5.2/8)
NBC: "Community"...

Re: Survivor:Samoa Ratings

feeds@yuku.com (Dr Will Hatch two point oh) — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:14:06 GMT

CSCin3D wrote:
Yeah, that's why Thailand had the fourth biggest ratings of any season ever (only after 1, 2 and ASS) The only people who bitched about/didn't like Thailand were us hardcore viewers, who at that time wanted more strategy. Ironic how things have changed now though, lol.

Indeed.

I have...

Re: Survivor:Samoa Ratings

feeds@yuku.com (CSCin3D) — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:35:31 GMT

Yeah, that's why Thailand had the fourth biggest ratings of any season ever (only after 1, 2 and ASS) The only people who bitched about/didn't like Thailand were us hardcore viewers, who at that time wanted more strategy. Ironic how things have changed now though, lol.

Re: Survivor:Samoa Ratings

feeds@yuku.com (tullfan2) — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:19:04 GMT

Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote:

MyPoody2 wrote:
I honestly think that survivor doesn't rely as heavily on suspense as most other reality shows do. TAR for example is almost completely unwatchable in re-run form. Survivor, however, can be rewatched hundreds of times because of the story-lines. DWTS and American Idol are also virtually un-re-watchable....

Re: Survivor:Samoa Ratings

feeds@yuku.com (sa0695) — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:57:26 GMT

Hopefully the ratings will be helped out tonight with the fact that there is no World Series game 7 on Fox. I'm sure that would have hurt the ratings if the Yankees didn't clinch last night.

Re: Survivor:Samoa Ratings

feeds@yuku.com (Dr Will Hatch two point oh) — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:39:51 GMT

MyPoody2 wrote:
I honestly think that survivor doesn't rely as heavily on suspense as most other reality shows do. TAR for example is almost completely unwatchable in re-run form. Survivor, however, can be rewatched hundreds of times because of the story-lines. DWTS and American Idol are also virtually un-re-watchable.

Only when the storyline focuses on the castaways and not some bullshitting overarching...

Re: Survivor:Samoa Ratings

feeds@yuku.com (Mypoody2) — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:13:20 GMT

CSCin3D wrote:

Mypoody2 wrote:

Quiddity wrote:
^But how in the world is that relevant to Survivor, a show that never airs repeats? We're not arguing the viability of DVDs of the show here, which have been proven to not work for likely the very reason you mention. That's 100%...

Re: Survivor:Samoa Ratings

feeds@yuku.com (CSCin3D) — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:23:48 GMT

Mypoody2 wrote:

Quiddity wrote:
^But how in the world is that relevant to Survivor, a show that never airs repeats? We're not arguing the viability of DVDs of the show here, which have been proven to not work for likely the very reason you mention. That's 100% irrelevent to Survivor's neilson ratings sans the recap episode, which is always viewed...

Re: Survivor:Samoa Ratings

feeds@yuku.com (TheEasyOne) — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:04:26 GMT

Mypoody2 wrote:

Quiddity wrote:
^But how in the world is that relevant to Survivor, a show that never airs repeats? We're not arguing the viability of DVDs of the show here, which have been proven to not work for likely the very reason you mention. That's 100% irrelevent to Survivor's neilson ratings sans the recap episode, which is always viewed...

Re: Survivor:Samoa Ratings

feeds@yuku.com (Olmec Donald) — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:18:44 GMT

I agree. Even if you know the boot order, the social interactions and ensuing drama/comedy can keep you interested. Which of those other shows apart from maybe TAR has that?

Re: Survivor:Samoa Ratings

feeds@yuku.com (Mypoody2) — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:16:13 GMT

Quiddity wrote:
^But how in the world is that relevant to Survivor, a show that never airs repeats? We're not arguing the viability of DVDs of the show here, which have been proven to not work for likely the very reason you mention. That's 100% irrelevent to Survivor's neilson ratings sans the recap episode, which is always viewed as irrelevent anyway.

I honestly think that survivor doesn't rely as...

Re: Survivor:Samoa Ratings

feeds@yuku.com (Dr Will Hatch two point oh) — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:38:09 GMT

You correctly said that viewing habits are changing as the availability of options increase. However, shows like Survivor and DWTS are mostly built around the suspense of who stays and who goes as opposed to anything else, so there would be no reason for Survivor to have accelerated losses in viewers unless the show dropped in quality.

Re: Survivor:Samoa Ratings

feeds@yuku.com (Quiddity) — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:26:48 GMT

^But how in the world is that relevant to Survivor, a show that never airs repeats? We're not arguing the viability of DVDs of the show here, which have been proven to not work for likely the very reason you mention. That's 100% irrelevent to Survivor's neilson ratings sans the recap episode, which is always viewed as irrelevent anyway.

Re: Survivor:Samoa Ratings

feeds@yuku.com (Dr Will Hatch two point oh) — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:44:22 GMT

Quiddity wrote:

Olmec Donald wrote:
NCIS is #1 because young people have by and large stopped watching TV and turned to the internet (or actually living their lives), while the middle-aged and elderly (NCIS' target audience) still continues to watch television.

...which is why people shouldn't be getting so worked over...

Survivor:Samoa Ratings

feeds@yuku.com (SurvivorQT4EVER) — Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:25:57 GMT

Make your guesses for Episode 10!

Ep 1. 13.3/21 23,662,000
Ep 2. 12.3/19 21,641,000
Ep 3. 12.7/20 21,677,000
Ep 4. 12.4/20 21,797,000
Ep 5. 10.8/17 18,415,000
Ep 6. 10.9/17 19,150,000
Ep 7. 12.0/19 20,893,000
Ep 8. 11.8/19 19,752,000
Ep 9. 12.0/20 20,374,000
Ep 10. 11.7/20 19,343,000
Ep 11. 12.6/20 21,214,000
Ep 12. 12.0/20 20,065,000
Ep 13. 11.7/19 19,650,000
Ep 14. 11.4/17 20,796,000
Ep Re. 9.1/15 15,481,000...